sai pallavi has been praised as a Lady Powerstar everywhere, yet at theatres, virata parvam barely made 3 crores in its first weekend. Similar to how Keerthy Suresh's female-centric film Gudluck Sakhi flopped on Day 1 alone. What did this therefore prove? In all honesty, celebrities like samantha and Nayanthara already contribute significantly just by virtue of their fame. Their movies not only have wild openings, but if good word of mouth and favourable reviews are added, those pictures will undoubtedly do well at the box office.

What possible explanation may there be for this? It appears that these actresses first earned the public's affection with their dazzling persona before beginning to act in films with a strong female lead. In this manner, they built a base first and then launched a successful attack. Only those starlets whose careers took off after receiving a fantastic glamour boost early on are truly proving to be those moneymakers.

Both Keerthy and sai pallavi had initial successes with films like mahanati and Fidaa, but the box office craze never materialised again. Should we claim that "glamour" wins in the end and "acting prowess" comes in second? All things considered, a movie's box office success largely depends on its content, and the mood of the audience following the second pandemic is also very perplexing.

మరింత సమాచారం తెలుసుకోండి: