Outlining the terms of reference for the inquiry committee, a bench presided over by justice ramana stated: "What led to the security lapse that resulted in the incident on january 5, 2022? Who exactly is at fault for this breach, and how much? What corrective actions or safety precautions are required to ensure the security of the prime minister or other protectees?"
the NGO Lawyer's Voice, which was represented by seasoned attorney Maninder Singh, filed a petition that resulted in the highest court's decision. The petitioner emphasised the need of protection for the nation's prime minister and sought the court to appoint an impartial commission to look into the situation. Since then, the matter has not been scheduled for a hearing. On august 2, a bench presided over by ramana voiced its displeasure with the maharashtra Wakf Board for trying to replace Attorney General (AG) K.K. Venugopal as a counsel in the case while hearing on a crucial issue: whether all land donated by Muslims for charitable purposes would fall under Wakf.
The AG had also written to the supreme court to express her severe disagreement with the Wakf Board's actions. "It is a severe, improper, and uncalled for attempt to interfere in the proper administration of justice by removing the lawyers representing the parties because all of this meddling with the removal of the counsel who are to represent the parties at the last minute. This is undoubtedly a contempt of court violation "In a letter to the registrar, the AG stated (judicial). The supreme court will probably discuss this issue soon.
the NGO Lawyer's Voice, which was represented by seasoned attorney Maninder Singh, filed a petition that resulted in the highest court's decision. The petitioner emphasised the need of protection for the nation's prime minister and sought the court to appoint an impartial commission to look into the situation. Since then, the matter has not been scheduled for a hearing. On august 2, a bench presided over by ramana voiced its displeasure with the maharashtra Wakf Board for trying to replace Attorney General (AG) K.K. Venugopal as a counsel in the case while hearing on a crucial issue: whether all land donated by Muslims for charitable purposes would fall under Wakf.
The AG had also written to the supreme court to express her severe disagreement with the Wakf Board's actions. "It is a severe, improper, and uncalled for attempt to interfere in the proper administration of justice by removing the lawyers representing the parties because all of this meddling with the removal of the counsel who are to represent the parties at the last minute. This is undoubtedly a contempt of court violation "In a letter to the registrar, the AG stated (judicial). The supreme court will probably discuss this issue soon.
