Well, Pawan doesn't appear to understand what the word "class war" means. He thought jagan was referring to the underprivileged. Is it only fair for individuals who have experienced poverty to discuss such matters, even if he believed it to be the case? Many well-known national figures have stood up for the poor and spoken out for them, including megastar chiranjeevi, who has accumulated millions of rupees.
Instead than disputing Jagan's authority to speak on behalf of the underprivileged, Pawan ought to have understood this. At the time, Pawan didn't tell Chiranjeevi: "Anna! You are wealthy. What justifies discussing poverty and the poor?"