The indian government's Forest Conservation Act Amendment Bill has been met with resistance from environmental groups as well as political parties. 'The forest is more than just trees. The bjp government is bringing forth such an amendment to remove the woods.

The Forest Conservation Act, which was enacted in india in 1980, is currently being amended by the Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change. 

Why is there a revision to the Forest Conservation Act?

The environmental group 'Friends of the Earth' sent millions of emails criticizing the indian government's effort. The Forest Protection Act was designed to restrict deforestation in all places coming within the term of 'deforestation,' such as the construction of highways, tunnels, and dams.

 The indian government is attempting to alter the Act. The first argument for rejecting this referendum is that it does not include the fundamental democratic right of all sectors of the population to participate in legislation, although it has different components that may have an impact on forests and forest resources.

'It was a wise decision to declare a state of emergency.'

Since the period of the British, the Forest Conservation Act has never been a law to safeguard the woods and the tribes who control the forests.

The governments have been annihilating disadvantaged people while stating that they must do many things for India's national majority. India's proclamation of a state of emergency sets a dangerous precedent. 

Indira Gandhi, to her surprise, shifted the law on forest conservation from state governments to a public list. As a result, the woodlands were protected to some extent.

There is a rule that requires not only the permission of the central government's cabinet but also the consent of the tribal people's village councils. The government's recent change to the law will weaken the previous statute. 

Only a small percentage of the wealthy are getting richer. The individuals on the margins are the ones who are most affected by the initiatives designed for them. The central government will fix any errors made by state administrations.

What does the bjp have to say about this?

Only modest amendments have been made to the new statute by the federal government. That is, those who deal with railway safety have been granted certain leeway. 

State governments have asked the federal government for permission to exploit non-forest lands. Even constructing a road to a few locations will take more than ten years. 

'State governments have more rights,'

The new law aims to give state governments more power. They are not required to seek approval from the central government. They also want to enable drilling techniques that aren't problematic outside of the forest.

Only one permission is obtained, for the construction of a 250 square meter building. After then, no permission is granted. Indigenous peoples have the same right to build houses as everyone else. This has been a long-standing need. 

Is the suggestion for an english amendment critical, we wondered? Legal specialists can read the amendment, translate it into all of the tribal languages, and deliver it to the tribes. Those who are interested can bring it to them and explain it to them. Some people are acting in a way that opposes what the indian government is bringing.