Questions, debates, and concerns regarding Facebook's negative impacts have reached new heights. The world's most powerful social networking site is discovered, unable to respond to concerns and allegations directly. Francis Hogan is at the centre of the current round of facebook criticism. Hogan, a former facebook employee, was exposed as a "wrong exposer" after leaving the company.

Hogan's major charge is that facebook prioritises company profit over social good and user wellbeing. When one considers Facebook's importance in the wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW'>digital world, one may appreciate the gravity of this charge. By revealing evidence and other important material through the press, he has startled the entire internet world.

The Cambridge Analytics scandal, which broke out in 2018, sparked a lot of debate since facebook was actively gathering information for advertising purposes, putting users' privacy in jeopardy. The uproar triggered condemnation of Facebook's for-profit activities, as well as the anti-cyber movement 'Let's Leave Facebook.' In the midst of this argument, the way facebook was used in the 2016 US election is also a point of contention. It has been claimed that facebook utilised its data-gathering techniques to target and target specific voters, and that false news played a significant role in the campaign.

Furthermore, facebook has been found to be a vehicle for distributing ideas and false news that promote violence and hatred in nations such as Myanmar. As the accusations mounted, many chastised facebook for failing to monitor the remarks that appeared on its site. New claims against facebook started to surface against this backdrop. They initially published in the American newspaper The Wall Street Journal. The complaint is that Instagram, a facebook subsidiary, is well aware that its practises are hazardous to young women's health, but it continues to utilise harmful strategies without taking alternative measures.

Questions have also been raised concerning the repercussions that will be imposed on facebook for its role in the incident. Aside from the legislative examination into Facebook's operations, there has been talk of splitting up the company's businesses to lessen the company's monopolistic status. Meanwhile, alarming information concerning Facebook's actions in india in censoring racist and violent content has surfaced. Furthermore, it has been noted that facebook has a history of relaxing its rules and ethics for powerful users. The response from facebook to these charges has been inadequate.

మరింత సమాచారం తెలుసుకోండి: