Arguments in the ap high court on Chandrababu's remand review petition in the skill development scam have ended. The court has reserved judgment on this occasion. A series of cases are registered against tdp leader Chandrababu. Arguments in the ap high court on Chandrababu's remand review petition in the skill development scam have ended. ap high court has reserved judgment on this occasion. Arguments in the amaravati Inner Ring Road case will be held on the 21st of this month in the High Court. Arguments on police custody and interim bail will be held in the acb court tomorrow. Apart from these, recently a PT warrant has been filed against Chandrababu in the fiber net case. CID has filed a petition against him in the acb court. The CID is alleging that the fiber net contract was given to Terasoft company against the rules.
Meanwhile, the ap high court on tuesday reserved its verdict on the quash petition filed by Chandrababu in the skill development case. chandrababu naidu has filed a petition seeking to quash the FIR and cancel the remand in the ap Skill Development case. Arguments were held on this petition from 12 noon today. supreme court Senior Advocates Harish Salve and siddharth Luthra argued on behalf of Chandrababu. mukul rohatgi argued on behalf of ap CID. Chandrababu's lawyers argued that the process of arrest was against the rules. But mukul rohatgi, counsel for ap CID, rejected these claims. Rohatgi said Chandrababu was arrested only after collecting all the evidence
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel