The criticism against tdp leader Chandrababu stems from the perception that he has consistently undervalued the bc (Backward Classes) community, asserting that he relies excessively on financial resources to win elections. Critics argue that Chandrababu allocated a disproportionately low number of seats to BCs, who constitute a significant portion of the population, compared to the seats given to the kamma community, which comprises only 4% of the population. 

The allegation is that Chandrababu has consistently neglected the interests of BCs and has even nominated candidates from the upper castes in BC-designated seats. In contrast, the narrative draws a parallel with NTR, the tdp founder, who was known for supporting BCs during his tenure. Under NTR's leadership, tdp gained the reputation of being a party for BCs, securing strong support from the community. 

However, since Chandrababu assumed leadership, there's a perception that BCs have been marginalized in favour of corporate interests, leading to a shift in TDP's priorities. The discontent among BCs is evident in their increased political activism and a growing realization of their numerical strength in influencing elections. As tdp faces criticism for sidelining BCs and focusing on them only as a vote bank, BCs are becoming more politically discerning. The analysis of TDP's candidate list for the 2024 elections reveals a perceived disregard for BCs, further fueling discontent. 

BCs, historically aligned with tdp, are now contemplating their political options amid the emergence of new parties, emphasizing their readiness to reciprocate political support to those who prioritize their interests. Overall, the sentiment is that BCs are prepared to respond strategically to TDP's political manoeuvres, signalling a potential shift in their allegiances.