The current scenario involves a contentious situation surrounding the remarks made by minister Udayanidhi stalin regarding Sanatana Dharma. These comments have sparked legal repercussions, prompting cases to be registered in various states, particularly eliciting strong disapproval from bjp leaders. The controversy has extended to the alliance with the congress party, with the latter asserting that Udayanidhi's remarks are of a personal nature and not representative of the alliance.

In response to the FIRs registered against him, Udayanidhi stalin sought the intervention of the supreme Court. However, the recent hearing took an unfavourable turn for him as the court rejected his defence. The supreme court expressed its displeasure with Udayanidhi's comments, emphasizing that, as a minister, he should exercise discretion and not abuse freedom of speech, expression, and religion.

The court's rebuke highlighted the gravity of Udayanidhi's position, noting that he holds a ministerial role and should be mindful of his statements. The upcoming hearing on march 15 indicates that further investigation into the matter will take place. Despite facing criticism, Udayanidhi has staunchly defended his comments, refusing to apologize and asserting that there is nothing wrong with his stance.

In the midst of this controversy, Udayanidhi also drew attention to a perceived discriminatory act involving prime minister Narendra Modi not inviting President draupadi murmu to the Parliament's inauguration based on her widowhood and tribal background. This complex situation underscores the intersection of politics, religion, and social issues in the current political landscape.