Google’s Gemini 3 AI models have been making waves after a strong early demo, ranking high on AI performance leaderboards. Curious how they compare to ChatGPT in graphic-generation tasks? Here’s what happened when both were tested on the same prompts.

1 The Test Setup

  • Three graphic-generation tasks were chosen
  • Both Gemini 3 and ChatGPT used identical prompts
  • Evaluation focused on creativity, accuracy, and visual appeal

2 Task 1: Illustration Creation

  • Gemini 3: Produced a detailed, vibrant illustration with proper perspective
  • ChatGPT: Generated a simpler version, less nuanced in color and depth
  • Winner: gemini 3

3 Task 2: Infographic Design

  • Gemini 3: Organized information clearly with visual hierarchy
  • ChatGPT: Provided a basic infographic, missing some design aesthetics
  • Winner: gemini 3

4 Task 3: Abstract Concept Art

  • Gemini 3: Created a creative and cohesive abstract image
  • ChatGPT: Produced conceptually accurate but visually plain output
  • Winner: gemini 3

5 Key Takeaways

  • Gemini 3 consistently outperformed ChatGPT in graphic generation
  • Shows strong potential for design, illustration, and visual content creation
  • Highlights the growing capabilities of AI beyond text

🌟 Bottom Line

While ChatGPT remains a powerful text-based AI tool, Gemini 3 currently leads in graphic generation, offering more detailed, visually appealing results for creative tasks.

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency, organization, employer, or company. All information provided is for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained herein. Readers are advised to verify facts and seek professional advice where necessary. Any reliance placed on such information is strictly at the reader’s own risk.

Find out more:

AI