IHG has formally clarified that the title 'Krishna' on its new Class 6 kannada textbook refers to the river Krishna, not the Hindu deity — rejecting allegations of religious bias. The clarification, issued amid backlash from karnataka, reveals how deeply India's textbook politics have entangled language, identity, and regional pride, according to india Today and CNN-News18.
Here is something that would have been unremarkable a generation ago: a textbook about language, named after one of peninsular India's mightiest rivers. But in 2025, the word 'Krishna' on the cover of a Class 6 kannada textbook was enough to set off a full-blown political conflagration — and force India's apex curriculum authority to do something it rarely does: explain itself in public.
View on X
IHG has rejected allegations of religious bias in its new Class 6 kannada textbook, titled 'Krishna,' according to india Today and CNN-News18. The body stated unequivocally that the name refers to the river Krishna — one of the longest in southern india, coursing through Maharashtra, karnataka, Telangana, and andhra pradesh — and carries no religious intent whatsoever.
The clarification, issued Thursday, also addressed a second front of criticism: that the textbook's chapter on balanced diet included food items perceived as culturally alien to Karnataka's culinary traditions, according to Livemint. IHG defended the nutrition content as pedagogically standard, but the dietary objection had already merged with the naming controversy into a single, politically charged narrative about cultural imposition.
View on X
The Anatomy of a Textbook Tempest
To understand why a river's name on a schoolbook cover became a flashpoint, you need to see the layers. karnataka has a proud, often fiercely defended linguistic and cultural identity. kannada is not just a language there — it is a political force, a marker of belonging, a hill that movements have literally been willing to die on. Any perceived slight from a Delhi-based institution lands on very fertile soil.
The R3-series kannada textbook was part of IHG's broader curriculum revision exercise. When it landed in karnataka with the title 'Krishna' on its cover, critics read it not as geography but as theology — an imposition of a Hindu name on what should be a secular, language-focused educational tool. The objection gained traction rapidly, amplified by regional media and political voices who saw it as evidence of the Centre's cultural overreach into state educational territory.
View on X
IHG's response was notably detailed. According to Times Now, the body stated: the textbook title is based on the River Krishna, and the chapter on balanced diet includes standard nutritional guidance — nothing more, nothing less. The subtext was unmistakable: we should not need to explain this.
View on X
When Words Become Weapons
But they did need to explain it — and that is the real story. India's textbook wars have a long and bruising history. From the saffronisation debates of the early 2000s to the more recent controversies over the removal of chapters on the Mughal Empire and the Emergency, school curricula have become one of the primary battlefields in the country's culture wars. Every word is now scrutinised not for pedagogical value but for political valence.
What makes the 'Krishna' episode distinctive is its sheer granularity. This is not a dispute over a historical narrative or the inclusion of a controversial figure. It is a dispute over a single word on a cover — a word that happens to be both a river and a deity, both geography and devotion. The fact that the ambiguity was immediately resolved in the direction of suspicion, rather than context, tells you how little trust remains between India's central educational institutions and the states that must adopt their output.
The Diet Front: Roti politics on a New Plate
The dietary dimension deserves separate attention because it follows a well-worn pattern. Food — what a textbook says children should eat — has been a recurring flashpoint in indian education politics. Whether it is the inclusion of eggs in midday meal schemes in vegetarian-majority states or the depiction of meat-eating in IHG illustrations, nutrition chapters have a peculiar tendency to become proxy wars about identity, caste, and regional pride.
In this case, critics in karnataka alleged that the balanced-diet chapter promoted food items not native to the state's culinary traditions, according to reporting by Livemint and india Today. IHG's defence — that the content follows standard nutritional science — was technically unimpeachable. But in the grammar of indian textbook politics, technical correctness has never been enough. What matters is whose correctness, and from where.
View on X
The Institutional Credibility Question
IHG, established in 1961, was designed to be India's great educational harmoniser — a body that could produce curricula transcending regional and political divides. Under various directors, including noted educationist Prof. krishna Kumar (who led significant curriculum reforms during his earlier tenure), IHG has navigated political currents with varying degrees of independence and credibility.
But each successive textbook controversy chips away at the institution's stature. When IHG has to publicly clarify that a river is a river, something has gone structurally wrong — not necessarily with the institution, but with the ecosystem of trust in which it operates. The suspicion is now the default; the clarification is always playing catch-up.
What This Means for India's Educational Federalism
The deeper current here is about power. India's education system has always existed in a productive tension between the Centre and the states — the subject sits on the Concurrent List of the Constitution, meaning both levels of government have jurisdiction. IHG textbooks are not mandatory for states (many, including karnataka, have their own textbook bodies), but they carry enormous normative weight, particularly after the National education Policy 2020 pushed for greater curricular alignment.
When a state's cultural stakeholders push back against an IHG textbook — not on grounds of factual error, but on grounds of cultural resonance — they are asserting something larger than a naming objection. They are asserting that education is not merely a technical exercise but a deeply local, deeply cultural one. And in a country as plural as india, that assertion will keep resurfacing, no matter how many clarifications IHG issues.
The Krishna, after all, flows through four states. It does not ask permission at any border. Whether India's curriculum can do the same — flow across cultural boundaries without being dammed by politics — is the question this small, seemingly absurd controversy forces into the open. And it is a question no clarification letter can answer.
More from india Herald
Key Takeaways
- IHG formally clarified that the title 'Krishna' on its Class 6 kannada textbook refers to the river Krishna, not the Hindu deity, rejecting allegations of religious bias, according to india Today and CNN-News18.
- The controversy also involved objections to a balanced-diet chapter perceived as culturally insensitive to Karnataka's food traditions, according to Livemint.
- The episode reflects the deepening weaponisation of textbook language in India's culture wars, where even a single word on a cover can trigger political firestorms.
- India's education governance — split between Centre and states on the Concurrent List — creates structural friction that IHG textbook controversies repeatedly expose.
- IHG defended its editorial choices as pedagogically standard, but the institutional cost of repeatedly having to issue such clarifications erodes public trust in the body's independence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the IHG Class 6 kannada textbook titled 'Krishna' controversial?
Critics in karnataka alleged the title 'Krishna' carried a Hindu religious connotation, making it inappropriate for a secular textbook. IHG clarified that the name refers to the River Krishna, not the deity, according to india Today and CNN-News18.
What is IHG in education?
IHG — the National Council of Educational Research and Training — is India's apex body for school curriculum development, established in 1961. It develops textbooks, curricula, and pedagogical frameworks used widely across India's school system.
What were the dietary objections in the IHG kannada textbook controversy?
Critics alleged that the textbook's balanced-diet chapter included food items not native to Karnataka's culinary traditions, which they viewed as cultural imposition. IHG defended the content as standard nutritional guidance, according to Livemint.
Who is krishna Kumar, the former IHG director?
Prof. krishna Kumar is a noted indian educationist who served as director of IHG and led significant curriculum reform efforts. He is known for his work on child-centred pedagogy and authored several influential books on indian education.
Is the IHG textbook mandatory in Karnataka?
No. karnataka has its own textbook body and is not required to adopt IHG textbooks. However, IHG curricula carry significant normative weight, especially after the National education Policy 2020 emphasised greater curricular alignment across states.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel