In London, prince Harry is now formally fighting for police protection. The trial, which will last three days, began on Tuesday, december 5, in Harry's natal nation. The Duke did not attend the trial in person but was represented by his attorney, Shaheed Fatima, who argued against the decision to deprive Harry of taxpayer-funded police security when he visits britain in 2020.

The Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (RAVEC) reached the decision after Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, stood down as "working royals." The solicitors for Harry have now spoken out about the "impact" of a "successful attack."

"This case is about a person's right to safety and security." According to Vanity Fair, Fatima stated in court, "There could not be a right more important to any of us."

Meanwhile, Harry's attorneys told people that RAVEC "should have considered the 'impact' that a successful attack on the claimant would have, bearing in mind his status, background, and profile within the royal family — which he was born into and will have for the rest of his life." RAVEC should have considered the implications of a successful assault on the claimant on the UK's reputation."

The home office has claimed that Harry and his family should be granted asylum on a "case-by-case basis" because he is no longer a "working member of the Royal Family and would be living abroad for the majority of the time." He had already volunteered to pay for his cross-channel protection, only to lose that legal battle earlier this year. A court later granted permission for a full hearing to reconsider the home Office's decision.

Although Harry was not present in court on Tuesday, he is said to have landed in London. He is now embroiled in up to five court cases, including one involving his legal battle with UK newspapers over phone-hacking allegations.
For more interesting updates wa click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel

Find out more:

Prince Harry

SIBY JEYYA

06/12/2023 07:08 AM