The debate on reservation in education often claims to “uplift the marginalized.” But real-life cases expose a very different picture. Take this example:


👉 Student X (SC) scored 300 marks in NEET.
👉 Student Y (UR) scored 562 marks in NEET.
👉 X’s father is an IAS officer.
👉 Y’s father is a waiter.
👉 X got an MBBS admission in Delhi, while Y is forced to take a drop year.

Is this what we call social justice? Let’s break it down.




1. Merit is Punished, Privilege is Rewarded

  • Despite working harder and scoring higher, Y is denied a seat.

  • X, already from a privileged background, gets rewarded with admission.



2. Reservation Ignores Economic Reality

  • X’s family is already wealthy and influential.

  • Y’s family struggles financially, yet gets no benefits because of the birth.



3. The True Victims of ‘Equality’

  • Countless deserving students like Y are sidelined.

  • This system demoralizes talent and fuels brain drain.



4. From Social Justice to Vote bank Politics

  • Reservation, meant for upliftment, is now a political tool.

  • Instead of helping the poor, it benefits the already privileged within reserved categories.



5. The Hard Question

  • Is this equality or institutionalized discrimination?

  • Shouldn’t support be based on economic need, not caste tags?



🔥 Punchline: “When a waiter’s son with 562 marks loses to an IAS officer’s son with 300 marks, it’s not social justice—it’s social injustice in the name of equality.”

Find out more: