Other things are in their place, but making arif mohammad khan a candidate for the bjp in the presidential election has its advantages. Rather, arif mohammad khan can also be a masterstroke from the bjp side.

Earlier, even OBCs did not vote for BJP. Earlier even Dalits did not vote for BJP. Earlier bjp used to be called a party of Brahmin-Baniya - but now it has remained like this? In OBC, except Yadav, all the voters have turned in favor of BJP. Had Dalits not voted for bjp, would Mayawati's BSP have won just one seat in the UP elections? There is a compulsion of the upper castes, bjp is also taking full advantage of it.

Also understand the difference between Arif and Kalam: it is arif mohammad khan who opposed the constitutional amendment in the Shah Bano case - and no such opposition had resigned directly, saying 'You are giving protection to the fanatics' Yes - this line suits BJP. This is when rajiv gandhi became the prime minister after winning the election with a huge majority.

If anyone can speak against the Muslim society on a sting in today's era, then it is arif mohammad khan - and it is not that he does all this because the Sangh and the bjp like all this. He is speaking all this since the time when the Sangh and bjp did not even mean much to speak.

Arif Mohammad Khan has stood by his stand ever since - and over a period of time it began to suit the agenda of the BJP. Not only selectively, but mostly there are talk of benefits for BJP. According to the agenda of the Sangh and the bjp, the case of APJ Abdul Kalam and arif mohammad khan seems to be common, but there are many differences between the two. Kalam's lifestyle suits the Sangh and the bjp - reading the Gita, worshiping Saraswati and playing the veena.

The big difference between the two is that former President APJ Abdul Kalam was never vocal towards Arif Mohammad Khan. Kalam never spoke all that arif mohammad khan speaks - and arif mohammad khan addresses everyone from the common people to the intellectual class.