Lula's explosive 'American pirate' attack on Trump's proposed 20% Hormuz shipping toll has cracked open a fault-line inside BRICS, according to Times of India reports. India, which depends on the Strait for over 60% of its crude imports while simultaneously courting deeper US defence ties, now faces the sharpest choose-a-side pressure the bloc has ever produced.
Here is a number that should keep South Block awake tonight: roughly 21 million barrels of oil pass through the Strait of Hormuz every single day, and India drinks deeply from that stream — over 60% of its crude imports transit the narrow chokepoint between Iran and Oman. Now picture a 20% toll booth slapped across it by a president whom the leader of the largest BRICS democracy just called, on camera, an 'American pirate.' The geopolitics of energy just got personal, and New Delhi is caught in the crossfire between two allies it cannot afford to lose.
According to the Times of India, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva launched an extraordinary verbal assault on Donald Trump's proposal to levy a shipping toll on Hormuz-transiting vessels, calling it nothing less than 'piracy.' Lula's language was deliberate — 'Pirates of Hormuz,' he said, inverting the Hollywood franchise into a diplomatic weapon. This was not a stray remark. It was a full-throated address positioning Brazil as the moral voice of the Global South against what Lula frames as American maritime extortion.
Meanwhile, Trump has been anything but conciliatory. The Times of India reports that fresh US air strikes on Iran continue, with Trump openly boasting about American air power. Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf fired back, pointing to 40 million Americans on food stamps and telling Washington to keep its economic advice to itself. Tehran has also issued an explosive warning: it will not commit to any memorandum of understanding if coercion persists, according to the same reports. The Strait, in other words, is not just a waterway — it has become the world's most dangerous negotiating table.
Political Pulse
Here is what the press releases from all sides will not tell you, but the corridors of South Block are quietly processing: Lula's 'pirate' salvo is not really about shipping tolls. It is about the soul of BRICS itself — whether the bloc is merely a talking shop for photo-ops or whether it becomes an active counter-pole to American unilateralism. And that question is poison for India.
The whisper in diplomatic circles, as India Herald's read of this situation suggests, is that New Delhi's nightmare scenario is not a US-Iran war per se — it is being forced to publicly pick a side within BRICS. India has spent three decades perfecting the art of strategic ambiguity: buying Russian oil while signing LEMOA with the Pentagon, investing in Chabahar port while hosting Trump at Ahmedabad. That tightrope works only so long as no one shakes the wire. Lula just gave it a violent yank.
Consider the arithmetic of discomfort. India needs the US for defence technology, semiconductor supply chains, and the Quad's Indo-Pacific architecture. It needs Iran for Chabahar — its only land-route bypass to Afghanistan and Central Asia that does not go through Pakistan. It needs BRICS credibility to maintain its Global South leadership claim, especially against China's courtship of the same constituency. And it needs Hormuz open and toll-free because a 20% levy on transiting crude would, by conservative industry estimates, add billions to India's annual import bill at a time when the current account deficit is already a political vulnerability.
The trade circles tracking this are abuzz with a grim calculation: if Trump's toll materialises — even partially — and BRICS members like Brazil and South Africa rally a formal counter-position, India will face a floor vote it has spent years avoiding. Abstaining, Delhi's favourite UN move, does not work inside a bloc where you are a founding architect.
What makes this moment structurally different from past BRICS tensions is Iran's own posture. The Times of India reports that Tehran is refusing to break under pressure, with Israeli intelligence reportedly warning Washington of Iranian plots to assassinate Trump himself — a claim, if even partially credible, that signals the crisis is metastasising beyond economics into outright security confrontation. India's Chabahar bet, its ₹14 lakh crore Gulf lifeline of remittances and energy, its 9-million-strong diaspora in the Gulf — all of it sits on a fault-line that Lula's speech has made impossible to ignore.
The deeper strategic irony, and this is the dimension the coverage elsewhere misses, is that Lula's attack actually strengthens China's hand inside BRICS more than Brazil's. Beijing has been pushing for BRICS to adopt a more explicitly anti-Western economic architecture — a common payments system, de-dollarisation frameworks, counter-sanctions mechanisms. Every time a Lula or a Ramaphosa publicly attacks Washington, it is Xi Jinping who gains agenda-setting power within the bloc. India, which has quietly resisted Chinese dominance of BRICS from the inside, now finds its most reliable internal ally — Brazil, the other democratic giant — charging ahead on a confrontation that serves Beijing's structural interests.
The talk among South Asian policy analysts is that Modi's team will attempt what it always attempts: a private channel to both Washington and Brasilia, quiet mediation language at the next BRICS sherpa meeting, and a public posture of 'concerned neutrality.' But there is a shelf life on that strategy. If the US actually operationalises a Hormuz toll — and Trump's record suggests the outrageous proposal of Tuesday often becomes the executive order of Friday — India will need a public position. And every possible public position costs something irreplaceable.
(The speculation about India's next diplomatic moves reflects analytical assessment and policy-circle chatter, not confirmed government positions.)
The forward-looking question India Herald would urge readers to watch is not whether Lula and Trump reconcile — personal theatrics between these two leaders are almost beside the point. The question is whether BRICS, at its next summit, produces a formal communiqué on Hormuz. If it does, India must either sign it (alienating Washington), water it down (alienating Brasilia and Pretoria), or block it (alienating everyone and handing China the narrative). There is no clean exit. The pirate flag Lula raised is now flying over India's most carefully constructed diplomatic architecture, and the wind is picking up.
Allegations reported here are attributed to named sources and remain unproven unless a court has ruled; matters sub judice are reported without prejudgment.
Reported and written with AI assistance under India Herald's editorial standards; a human editor governs publication.
More from India Herald
Key Takeaways
- Lula's 'American pirate' attack on Trump's Hormuz toll proposal has exposed the deepest ideological crack inside BRICS since its expansion, forcing India toward a public position it has spent decades avoiding.
- India's over-60% crude import dependence on Hormuz-transiting oil means a 20% US toll would add billions to the annual import bill — a direct economic threat New Delhi cannot rhetorically sidestep.
- The real winner of the Lula-Trump clash is China, which gains agenda-setting power inside BRICS every time a democratic member state publicly attacks Washington, undermining India's quiet internal resistance to Beijing's bloc dominance.
- Watch the next BRICS sherpa meeting and summit communiqué: if Hormuz language makes it to the draft, India faces a three-way lose — sign, water down, or block — with no clean diplomatic exit.
By the Numbers
- Over 60% of India's crude oil imports transit the Strait of Hormuz, making any toll or blockade a direct threat to India's energy security.
- Approximately 21 million barrels of oil pass through the Strait of Hormuz daily, per industry estimates.
- Iran's parliament speaker cited 40 million Americans on food stamps in his counter-attack on Trump's economic posture, as reported by the Times of India.
The 5W+H: Who, What, When, Where, Why, How
- Who: Brazilian President Lula da Silva, US President Donald Trump, and India's diplomatic establishment navigating the BRICS divide.
- What: Lula publicly called Trump an 'American pirate' over a proposed 20% shipping toll on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, deepening the BRICS split, as reported by the Times of India.
- When: July 2025, during an address responding to Trump's escalating military and economic posture toward Iran.
- Where: The confrontation plays out across the Strait of Hormuz, BRICS diplomatic channels, and has direct consequences for India's energy and trade corridors.
- Why: Trump's proposed toll and fresh US air strikes on Iran have galvanised Global South opposition led by Brazil, forcing fence-sitting BRICS members like India to confront incompatible alliances.
- How: Lula framed Trump's toll as piracy in a televised speech, turning it into a sovereignty issue for the Global South; Iran simultaneously refused to capitulate, warning it would not commit to a memorandum if coercion continued, per Times of India reports.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Lula say about Trump regarding Hormuz?
Brazilian President Lula called Trump an 'American pirate' and described the proposed 20% US shipping toll on Strait of Hormuz traffic as 'piracy,' according to the Times of India. He framed it as a sovereignty issue for the Global South.
Why does the Lula-Trump clash matter for India?
India imports over 60% of its crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz and depends on both US defence ties and Iranian cooperation for the Chabahar port. A BRICS split over Hormuz forces India to choose between incompatible alliances it has balanced for decades.
How does China benefit from the BRICS Hormuz dispute?
Every public anti-American stance by democratic BRICS members like Brazil strengthens China's push for an explicitly counter-Western bloc architecture — de-dollarisation, counter-sanctions, and common payment systems — which India has quietly resisted from within.
What is Trump's proposed Hormuz toll?
Trump has proposed a 20% shipping toll on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, which the Times of India reports Lula has condemned as piracy. The toll, if implemented, would significantly raise global energy transport costs.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel