Chief minister Y S jagan Mohan reddy claimed a few weeks ago that he is at odds with eenadu and ramoji rao rather than the tdp and Chandrababu Naidu. Some people questioned how a newspaper could engage in political conflict when he stated that eenadu is the ysr Congress's adversary but not the TDP. But if one regularly follows eenadu, it is starting to come true. The ysr congress and the eenadu would be at war in 2024. ramoji rao and jagan Mohan reddy would face off.

Ramoji Rao wrote a paper today to refute jagan Mohan Reddy's remarks on amaravati in the Assembly. Usually, media reports what politicians say. The media’s opinion comes in the editorial and not in other sections. However, eenadu has been writing lengthy editorials lately for every column, and today's edition is entirely editorialised about Amaravati. ramoji rao addressed the population of amaravati and the lands supplied by the farmers on the top page in addition to all the other issues that he took the time to address with Jagan.

Ramoji Rao attempted to refute Jagan's assertion that amaravati is owned by Kammas by claiming that it is a part of the Tadikonda sc reserved constituency. Additionally, he claimed that by attributing Kammas to amaravati, a chief minister was inciting hate among the populace. If this is the case, if everyone owns amaravati, and if everyone contributed to the pooling of amaravati lands, why are only members of one caste taking part in the current padayatra and agitation? Why are currently only leaders of one caste, regardless of what party they are in, talking about Amaravati?

Speaking on behalf of amaravati are chandrababu naidu and his tdp leaders, Y S Chowdary, Satyaprasad, Paturi Nagabhushanam of the BJP, K Narayana of the CPI, and Ch Baburao of the CPM. Which caste do all of these leaders represent? For the past 1000 days, the farmers have been protesting in Mandadam village under a pandal. Who are the individuals seated beneath the pandal? Even people from 28 other villages, including at least Mandadam village, are participating in the demonstration, including SCs, STs, BCs, and Muslims.

Is it not true that one caste has purchased land in amaravati, and that they are the ones protesting and bringing legal claims? Why does eenadu claim that the lands were given by the farmers of these 29 villages if they were acquired from the farmers? These buyers are where? Why does ramoji rao not address those who bought lands? If not to defend the interests of the Kammas in amaravati, why is eenadu fighting jagan in politics? If it is to be believed, let eenadu reveal the names of individuals who bought the land and on whose names the same land was transferred to the government under the land pooling scheme.


మరింత సమాచారం తెలుసుకోండి: