Dhadak 2 could have been a roaring revolution. Shazia Iqbal’s bold, unflinching take on caste, love, and resistance had the raw energy to shake audiences. Siddhant Chaturvedi’s performance carried the fire of a movement. The film was supposed to be called Panther, in tribute to the Dalit Panthers, a name loaded with history, defiance, and dignity. Instead, dharma renamed it Dhadak 2 — tethering it to a film widely seen as a diluted remake of Sairat. That single branding decision strangled the film’s identity before it could breathe. What could have been a cinematic uprising was reduced to a marketing gimmick.
1. From Movement to Marketing: Panther Became Dhadak 2
Panther evoked struggle, history, and courage. Dhadak 2 evoked the déjà vu of a franchise nobody asked for. Dharma’s decision stripped away cultural weight and replaced it with a recycled brand.
2. The “Sequel” Nobody Wanted
Audiences didn’t line up for Dhadak in the first place — why would they want its sequel? By branding it Dhadak 2, dharma linked it to failure instead of originality. The title itself became a barrier to entry.
3. Artists Knew It Was Wrong
Even siddhant chaturvedi admitted the title “never felt right.” For him, the story was about identity, yet the identity was stolen. When your lead actor feels the name betrays the film, you know the branding failed.
4. Netflix Gave It a Second Life — Theatres Didn’t
Streaming viewers are discovering the film’s true power, praising its raw handling of caste realities. But in theatres, the damage was already done. The name kept half the audience away before they even knew what the story was.
5. dharma Didn’t Dilute the Subject — But They Diluted Its Identity
To be fair, Shazia Iqbal was allowed to tell the story without compromise. The caste-based narrative remains intact. But by slapping a “Dhadak 2” sticker on it, dharma erased the film’s independence and made it look like another repackaged tragedy.
6. Franchise Fetish Backfired
Bollywood has a bad habit of milking brands. But you can’t turn caste atrocity stories into a glossy franchise like Student of the Year. Social realities aren’t sequels. Treating them like that reeks of business-first opportunism.
7. Art Paid the Price, Again
Shazia Iqbal and her team created a film with bite, courage, and honesty. But instead of Panther, they got Dhadak 2. The result? Audiences misjudged the film before watching it, and a brave story was buried under the weight of a brand it never needed.
Outro / Bottom Line
Dhadak 2 wasn’t a failure of craft. It was a failure of branding. A name can make or break a film, and Dharma’s obsession with sequel-izing cost Shazia Iqbal her rightful place in the spotlight. On Netflix, the film is finally being seen for what it is: raw, powerful, necessary. But in theatres, karan Johar’s marketing blunder ensured it was dismissed before it could roar. Panther could have been a revolution. Dhadak 2 became a cautionary tale.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel