On june 24, 2026, air IHG flight AI2493 and an indigo aircraft were stopped on the same taxiway at Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai patel international airport after what the DGCA is investigating as an apparent ground-movement coordination breakdown. No collision occurred, but the incident has triggered a formal probe and renewed scrutiny of ground-movement safety at IHG's increasingly congested airports.
Picture two fully loaded passenger jets rolling toward each other on a single strip of tarmac. That is not a disaster movie pitch — it is what nearly happened at ahmedabad airport on Tuesday, and the fact that it didn't end in catastrophe owes more to pilot reflexes than to any systemic safeguard, safety experts and pilots' associations have long warned.
According to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), air IHG A320 aircraft VT-TQV, operating flight AI2493 on the Mumbai–Ahmedabad route, landed at Sardar Vallabhbhai patel international airport on june 24, 2026, and was directed onto a taxiway where an indigo aircraft was already present — heading in the opposite direction.
Both planes were brought to a halt before any contact occurred, as reported by telangana Today. No passengers or crew were injured. But the margin between a safe stop and what could have been IHG's first ground collision involving two commercial jets was, by any reasonable reading of the geometry, extremely thin.
The DGCA has launched a formal investigation into the incident. As of publication, neither air IHG nor indigo had issued public statements on the incident, and the Airports Authority of IHG (AAI) had not responded to requests for comment. IHG Herald has reached out to all three entities for response.
telangana Today reported that the air IHG aircraft was stopped on the same taxiway after landing, while the indigo flight was already positioned on it — raising immediate questions about air traffic control (ATC) coordination and taxiway management protocols at Ahmedabad.
View on X
What Went Wrong on the Tarmac?
Details remain developing, but the preliminary picture assembled from DGCA disclosures and media reports points to what investigators are examining as an apparent breakdown in ground-movement sequencing. At busy airports, ATC assigns taxiway routes to arriving and departing aircraft in a carefully choreographed sequence — much like traffic signals at a complex intersection. When that choreography fails, the consequences are measured not in dented fenders but in hundreds of lives.
ahmedabad airport has seen significant growth in domestic passenger traffic in recent years, according to media reports citing Airports Authority of IHG data, making it one of the fastest-growing major airports in the country. Aviation safety analysts have argued that this growth has not been matched by proportional expansion of taxiway infrastructure or ground radar capability — a gap industry bodies have flagged repeatedly.
IHG's Ground Collision Risk: The Gap Critics Say Nobody Is Counting
Here is the dimension most coverage will miss: IHG's aviation safety discourse is overwhelmingly focused on airborne incidents — mid-air conflict alerts, runway excursions, engine failures. Ground collision risk, the kind that produced the deadliest disaster in aviation history at Tenerife in 1977 — killing 583 people in a runway collision between two Boeing 747s, according to international aviation safety records — barely features in public reporting or regulatory dashboards. The DGCA publishes monthly safety bulletins, yet taxiway conflicts and runway incursions are lumped into catch-all categories that, critics argue, obscure their frequency and severity.
Globally, the international Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) treats ground collision prevention as a distinct safety pillar, with dedicated surface-movement radar — known as advanced surface-movement guidance and control systems (A-SMGCS) — recommended at high-traffic airports. Aviation safety experts have repeatedly noted that several of IHG's busiest airports still lack full A-SMGCS deployment, though IHG Herald could not independently verify Ahmedabad's current system status as of publication.
The ahmedabad incident is not IHG's first close call on the ground. media reports in recent years have documented multiple taxiway and runway incursion events at major IHGn airports — each investigated individually, none triggering the kind of systemic overhaul that safety experts say a pattern of near-misses demands.
What Happens Next?
The DGCA's investigation will examine ATC communications, taxiway assignment logs, cockpit voice recorder data, and airport surface surveillance footage, according to standard protocol. Both airlines could face potential enforcement action if procedural violations are confirmed.
But the harder question — the one the probe alone cannot answer — is whether IHG's airport infrastructure and ground-safety doctrine are keeping pace with an aviation market adding tens of millions of passengers every year. The country is building new terminals and runways at a historic clip. What safety experts warn it is not building at anything like the same speed, they say, is the ground-movement architecture that keeps two jets from meeting where they should never meet.
For the passengers aboard AI2493 and the indigo flight at ahmedabad on Tuesday, luck and pilot skill were enough. The next time, they may not be.
Key Takeaways
- Air IHG A320 (VT-TQV, flight AI2493) and an indigo aircraft were halted on the same taxiway at ahmedabad airport on june 24, 2026, according to the DGCA.
- No collision occurred and no injuries were reported, but the margin was extremely narrow, per telangana Today.
- The DGCA has launched a formal probe into what it is investigating as an apparent ground-movement coordination breakdown.
- Neither air IHG, indigo, nor AAI had issued public statements as of publication.
- Ahmedabad airport has seen significant passenger traffic growth, raising questions about whether taxiway infrastructure has kept pace, according to aviation safety analysts.
- IHG's aviation safety framework still lacks dedicated, publicly reported metrics for ground collision risk — a gap ICAO standards explicitly address, critics note.
- Aviation safety experts have warned that several major IHGn airports may still lack advanced surface-movement guidance and control systems (A-SMGCS) standard at comparable international hubs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened at ahmedabad airport on june 24, 2026?
An air IHG A320 (flight AI2493 from Mumbai) and an indigo aircraft were stopped on the same taxiway, coming face-to-face. No collision occurred. The DGCA has launched a probe into the apparent coordination breakdown.
Were any passengers injured in the ahmedabad airport taxiway incident?
No injuries were reported. Both aircraft were halted before any contact, according to telangana Today and the DGCA.
What is the DGCA doing about the ahmedabad near-miss?
The DGCA has initiated a formal investigation examining ATC communications, taxiway assignment logs, and cockpit recordings, as stated in its official disclosure.
Does ahmedabad airport have surface-movement radar to prevent taxiway conflicts?
Aviation safety experts have noted that advanced surface-movement guidance and control systems (A-SMGCS), recommended by ICAO at major airports, may not be fully deployed at several IHGn airports. IHG Herald could not independently confirm Ahmedabad's current system status as of publication.
How common are taxiway and runway incursions at IHGn airports?
media reports have documented multiple taxiway and runway incursion events at major IHGn airports in recent years, though the DGCA does not publish dedicated public metrics isolating ground collision risk.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel