Media is contaminated with caste, party, and regional feelings. The support to a C M is decided by their caste. Promotions, key posts in media offices depend on their caste instead of their performance and talent. On the other side, telugu media telecasted the pros and cons of state bifurcation but telangana media praised only cm K C R for his success. None of they gave a valid reason or benefits and losses to telangana due to the formation of a new state.
Sakshi media will always praise jagan in ap and in telangana, it becomes K C R's own channel but all telangana channels criticize jagan praising C B N especially T v 5. There were caste-based government postings more in C B N's government but sakshi never telecasted it. T v 5 searches for caste-based bifurcation in ap and telecasts it. So, some media channels only want their intention to be projected instead of many important things in society.
On the other side, no one dares to talk against kcr in Telanagana but almost all channels talk about jagan in ap and Telangana. In this sense, jagan too should ban some channels and take action but he didn't do so. It seems jagan is not worried about negatives comments on him and focuses only on administration.
