There’s irony. And then there’s this.
In Pilibhit, a grand entrance has been built and christened “Shaheed Bhagat Singh Dwar.” The name invokes sacrifice, defiance, revolution. You expect the fierce gaze of Bhagat Singh. The hat. The fire in the eyes.
Instead?
The gate features photographs of present-day political leaders — the Prime Minister, the Chief Minister, ministers, MPs, MLAs, and local office-bearers.
But not a single image of Bhagat Singh.
Let that sink in.
• A freedom fighter’s name headlines the structure.
• Contemporary politicians dominate the visuals.
• The martyr becomes a footnote in his own memorial.
This isn’t about one party versus another. It’s about something more basic — respect.
When you invoke the name of a revolutionary who gave his life for the country, the spotlight should stay on him. Not shift to those currently holding office. Legacy should not be background decoration while optics take center stage.
Because here’s the uncomfortable truth: when memorials start looking like campaign posters, history starts feeling like branding.
The sarcasm writes itself. Some supporters may claim they “see” Bhagat Singh’s spirit reflected in today’s leadership. But symbolism cannot replace substance. A nameplate is not homage. A photograph is not ideology.
Bhagat Singh didn’t fight for his name to be used as a header while others occupy the frame.
Memorials should immortalize sacrifice — not amplify incumbency.
If we can’t even center a martyr at his own gate, what exactly are we honoring?
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel