Release Halted by Court: The kerala Story 2: Goes Beyond was scheduled to release on Friday, february 27, 2026, but the kerala High court imposed a 15-day interim stay.
Reason for Stay: The court acted on petitions claiming the film could spark communal tension and disturb public peace.
Immediate Impact: The movie will not be screened in any theaters during the stay period.
Blow to Producers: The sudden halt is considered a major setback for the filmmakers and distributors.
Advance Bookings Affected
Pre-Sales Began Early: Before the legal order, the film had already sold around 5,000 tickets through BookMyShow.
Refund Concerns: With the stay in place, bookings may be cancelled and refunds processed.
Financial Losses Likely: The producers could face significant monetary losses due to halted screenings and disrupted promotions.
Why the Film Sparked Controversy
Teaser Release: The teaser dropped on january 30, 2026, triggering widespread debate.
Sensitive Plot: It portrays three Hindu girls—played by Ulka Gupta, aishwarya Ojha, and Aditi Bhatia—allegedly targeted for religious conversion after love relationships.
Bold Claim: The teaser opens with the line, “In 25 years, india will become an Islamic state,” drawing sharp reactions.
Disturbing Scenes: A controversial sequence shows the lead character being forcibly fed beef by her in-laws.
Slogan Highlighted: “Ab Tohhenge Nahi… Ladenge” reinforces the film’s confrontational tone.
Petition and Political Reaction
Legal Challenge Filed: Biologist Sreedev Namboodiri petitioned the High court, alleging the film defames kerala and spreads baseless claims.
Defamation Allegation: The plea argues the movie isolates kerala and projects imagined fears onto the state.
CM’s Opposition: kerala Chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan called the film propaganda and a threat to secularism.
Call for Boycott: Vijayan urged people to oppose the sequel, stating it spreads communal hatred.
Filmmakers’ Defense
Not Anti-Kerala: producer Vipul Amrutlal Shah stated the film does not target kerala but highlights a serious issue.
Data Defense: He defended controversial figures cited in the first film, claiming that supporting details were shared publicly.
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure accuracy, we make no warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the content. Any reliance you place on the information is strictly at your own risk. The views, opinions, or claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any organization mentioned. We disclaim any liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of this article.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel