1. New GST Ruling Hits Food Delivery Giants
Zomato and swiggy are facing a new annual tax liability of Rs 180-200 crore each following a recent GST Council clarification. The ruling mandates that online marketplaces must pay 18% GST on delivery fees collected on behalf of gig workers, a responsibility previously considered exempt. This marks a significant change in the taxation of India’s food delivery sector.

2. Understanding the GST Clarification
Under the new ruling, Section 9(5) of the Central GST Act brings local delivery services under GST compliance. Platforms like zomato and swiggy are now liable to collect and remit an 18% GST on delivery fees, resolving a long-standing dispute over whether delivery charges passed to gig workers were taxable. Previously, platforms argued that these fees were not their revenue, but the government has clarified that delivery is a taxable service, with the obligation resting on the aggregator.

3. Financial Implications for Platforms
The new tax obligation translates to a significant financial burden of Rs 180-200 crore annually for both zomato and Swiggy. industry insiders warn that this could squeeze profit margins, especially as delivery is a core revenue-generating service, unlike e-commerce platforms where delivery is ancillary. The additional tax will also affect working capital management, requiring careful financial planning.

4. Passing the Cost to Delivery Partners and Customers
Executives from both companies have indicated plans to offset the GST burden by sharing it between delivery partners and consumers. Reports suggest:

Reduced earnings for delivery workers in the short term.

Potential increase in delivery charges for customers.

A senior zomato executive noted that delivery partners may initially face lower earnings, while a consumer levy is under consideration. swiggy confirmed similar plans, highlighting the challenge of balancing compliance costs without alienating workers or customers.

5. industry Experts’ Perspective
Experts warn that passing the tax burden could have mixed effects:

Earnings Pressure: Gig workers may experience reduced income, impacting workforce satisfaction.

Consumer Impact: Higher delivery charges could lead to lower order frequency or customer churn.

Margin Squeeze: Platforms may have to absorb part of the cost if competitive pressures prevent full transfer to customers.

6. Comparisons With Other Sectors
Unlike e-commerce or quick commerce platforms, where delivery is secondary, food aggregators rely heavily on delivery services for revenue. This makes the GST compliance cost more impactful on operational margins and overall business strategy.

7. Possible Long-Term Effects

Platforms may restructure delivery incentives to offset reduced earnings.

There could be a gradual increase in consumer delivery fees over time.

Competition between zomato and swiggy may intensify as both try to manage costs without losing customers.

8. The Bigger Picture
The ruling underscores the government’s clarity on taxing wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW'>digital services and gig economy operations. It also sets a precedent for other marketplaces that handle third-party services, ensuring a more standardized GST compliance framework.

9. Key Takeaways for Consumers and Workers

Delivery fees might increase marginally in the coming months.

Delivery partners may see temporary earnings adjustments.

Consumers and industry watchers should expect operational changes as platforms adapt to the new tax rules.

10. Conclusion
The GST clarification represents a significant structural shift for food delivery platforms. While it increases tax compliance responsibilities and operational costs for zomato and swiggy, it also brings long-term clarity on taxation for gig-economy services. How platforms balance the cost between delivery workers and customers will determine both profitability and market competitiveness in the evolving indian food delivery sector.

Disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency, organization, employer, or company. All information provided is for general informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information contained herein. Readers are advised to verify facts and seek professional advice where necessary. Any reliance placed on such information is strictly at the reader’s own risk.