Usually, the director gets most of the blame when a movie doesn't perform to the intended standard. It goes without saying that if the director's movie falls short of expectations, he will have to bear the consequences. However, the kinds of cover-up narratives that certain non-Telugu filmmakers are crafting after faltering with their films amuse everyone.
 
The director of war 2, Siddhart Anand, stated earlier this year that the reason the movie didn't work well at the box office was because most of the audience hadn't flown a fighter plane. Later, the filmmaker was the target of trolls who made fun of him, asking whether he thought viewers would watch his movies after flying fighter aircraft simply because the main character was a pilot.
 
Lokesh Kangaraj's remarks on Leo's non-peaking performance at the box office came next. In response to criticism directed at the hero's flashback segment, he suggested that the entire scene may be a fabrication. He made the implication that the flashback depicted in the movie is told by a character and may not be true. Many were offended by this gifted director's claim that his narration may be phony after spending so much money on the movie.
 

The most recent information concerns Goat's creator, venkat Prabhu. He stated that because the movie had ties to the chennai Super Kings squad, telugu and kannada fans could not have related to it. venkat prabhu has been criticized for blaming the audience's cricket selections for the inadequacies of his own film. It is not a smart idea for directors to fabricate such badly structured cover-up scenarios when they are unable to properly captivate the audience. Rather of putting out meaningless cover drives, they should take responsibility for their errors and work to improve.
 

 

Find out more: