In telangana, the state government’s decision to provide free bus services for women has been met with strong criticism from a bjp leader, popularly referred to as the “Lady Pawan Kalyan” for her fiery speeches and aggressive political style. She has argued that such schemes are nothing more than populist gimmicks designed to win votes rather than empower women in the long run. According to her, the focus should be on creating jobs, ensuring safety, and improving infrastructure instead of doling out freebies that strain the state’s finances without offering sustainable benefits.
What makes her stand more intriguing, however, is the contrast with her own party’s stance in neighboring Andhra Pradesh. There, the bjp has openly supported similar welfare schemes, including free bus rides for women, as part of its populist outreach strategy. This contradiction highlights the double standards in politics, where the same policy is praised in one state for its inclusivity and condemned in another as reckless populism. It reflects how electoral calculations and regional dynamics often dictate political positions, rather than consistency in ideology or governance models.
For ordinary citizens, such flip-flops only add to the confusion. women in telangana who see real benefit from the scheme — saving money on daily commutes and gaining greater mobility — may struggle to understand why leaders would oppose it, especially when the same party supports it just across the border. Ultimately, this episode underscores a larger truth about indian politics: welfare schemes are less about principle and more about political positioning. Whether it’s called empowerment or populism depends entirely on which side of the border, or which side of the opposition, a party happens to be standing.
What makes her stand more intriguing, however, is the contrast with her own party’s stance in neighboring Andhra Pradesh. There, the bjp has openly supported similar welfare schemes, including free bus rides for women, as part of its populist outreach strategy. This contradiction highlights the double standards in politics, where the same policy is praised in one state for its inclusivity and condemned in another as reckless populism. It reflects how electoral calculations and regional dynamics often dictate political positions, rather than consistency in ideology or governance models.
For ordinary citizens, such flip-flops only add to the confusion. women in telangana who see real benefit from the scheme — saving money on daily commutes and gaining greater mobility — may struggle to understand why leaders would oppose it, especially when the same party supports it just across the border. Ultimately, this episode underscores a larger truth about indian politics: welfare schemes are less about principle and more about political positioning. Whether it’s called empowerment or populism depends entirely on which side of the border, or which side of the opposition, a party happens to be standing.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel