Mumbai: a person does not turn out to be a citizen of india simply through possessing documents like Aadhaar card, PAN card or a voter id, the bombay high court on tuesday stated whilst refusing bail to a man, allegedly from Bangladesh, for entering india illegally.

the man is accused of staying in india for greater than a decade with cast and fabricated files.

A bench of Justice amit Borkar stated provisions of the Citizenship Act lay down who may be a citizen of india and the way citizenship can be received and files inclusive of the Aadhaar card, PAN card and voter identification are simplest supposed for identification or availing offerings.

The court refused bail to Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, speculated to be a Bangladeshi country wide, who entered india illegally without a valid passport or tour documents. He allegedly procured cast indian documents such as Aadhaar card, PAN card, voter identity and additionally an indian passport.

In 1955, parliament passed the Citizenship Act which created a permanent and complete device for obtaining citizenship, Justice Borkar noted.

"in my view, the Citizenship Act of 1955 is the principle and controlling law for identifying questions about nationality in india today. this is the statute that lays down who may be a citizen, how citizenship may be obtained and in what situations it is able to be misplaced," he said.

"simply having files along with Aadhaar card, PAN card or voter id does now not, through itself, make someone a citizen of India. these documents are meant for identification or availing services, however they do now not override the simple felony necessities of citizenship as prescribed inside the Citizenship Act," the HC stated.

The law attracts a clean line among lawful citizens and illegal migrants, the bench stated.

humans falling in the class of unlawful migrants are barred from obtaining citizenship through most of the criminal routes mentioned within the Citizenship Act, it introduced.

"This distinction is vital as it protects the sovereignty of the usa and ensures that benefits and rights meant for citizens aren't wrongfully taken by using the ones who have no criminal fame to stay in india," the court stated.

The bench, while refusing bail to Sardar, mentioned that verification of his documents become still on and the research was also nevertheless persevering with, and the police's worry that he may additionally abscond if granted bail is a actual apprehension.

The allegations inside the case are not small and it is not pretty much staying in india with out permission or overstaying, however it's far about making and the use of fake and solid identification documents with the purpose of pretending to be an indian citizen, the HC stated.

Sardar changed into booked below provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Passport (access to India) Act and the Foreigners Order.

The court docket cited the investigation within the case remains happening with reference to genuineness of the Aadhaar card, that's being established with the aid of the precise identification Authority of india (UIDAI).

Sardar in his bail plea said he became a bona fide citizen of india and that there has been no conclusive or reliable evidence to prove he is a countrywide of Bangladesh.

He further claimed his files are related together with his earnings tax information and enterprise registration and that he has been living in Mumbai's neighbouring thane district in view that 2013.

The prosecution adversarial the plea, claiming if the accused become launched on bail, he may additionally abscond.

The police similarly stated a probe changed into on to examine if there has been a larger organised community concerning illegal immigration and identification fraud.

The court docket in its order stated the allegations against Sardar aren't restrained to an insignificant technical violation of immigration norms, however indicate a case of planned concealment of identification and creation of forged documents for acquiring the indian citizenship blessings.

whilst the charter of india become being drafted, the united states of america had simply long past via a historical transformation and the partition at the time triggered a big motion of humans throughout borders, growing a need to determine who could be usual as residents of the brand new kingdom, it noted.

preserving this in mind, framers of the charter decided to make an arrangement for figuring out citizenship, the high courtroom stated.

The constitution laid down provisions which gave instant clarity on who could be taken into consideration a citizen at the very starting of the Republic and it gave the elected parliament the powers to make legal guidelines on citizenship in destiny, the court cited.

Disclaimer: This content has been sourced and edited from Indiaherald. While we have made adjustments for clarity and presentation, the unique content material belongs to its respective authors and internet site. We do not claim possession of the content material.