Washington Sundar's persistent selection uncertainty stems not from any deficiency in his game but from India's extraordinary surplus of all-rounders and the selection committee's preference for specialists in marquee formats. Despite consistent performances across Tests, ODIs, and T20Is, Sundar remains a perpetual squad-fringe player — called upon in crises, sidelined when the first-choice XI is fit. His story is less about one man and more about how Indian cricket's depth has become its cruelest sorting mechanism.
Here is a man who walked into the Gabba as a 21-year-old, batted India out of a corner against Australia's most hostile attack on the bounciest deck in world cricket, and has spent most of the time since trying to convince the same dressing room that he deserves to be in it full-time. Washington Sundar's career is not a failure story — it is something stranger and, for the player living it, possibly more maddening: a success story that never quite converts into permanence.
At 26, Sundar has done nearly everything the Indian cricket establishment has asked of him. He has opened the batting in T20 internationals, batted at No. 7 in Tests to rescue innings, bowled dry off-spin in the powerplay when no other Indian spinner wanted that assignment, and held catches at short leg that most fielders would have let bounce off their shins. According to ESPNcricinfo, his Test batting average sits comfortably above 30, and his economy rate in T20Is remains among the tightest for any Indian spinner in the format's history. The numbers say he belongs. The selection sheets, series after series, say "maybe next time."
The question 10,000 people are searching right now is deceptively simple: what is going on with Washington Sundar? The answer is not simple at all — because it has almost nothing to do with Washington Sundar.
The Embarrassment-of-Riches Trap
Indian cricket in 2026 does not have a Washington Sundar problem. It has a Washington Sundar surplus. The spinning all-rounder slot — the role Sundar was born to fill — is the most congested position in world cricket. Ravindra Jadeja, despite being 37, remains the first-choice left-arm option in Tests and ODIs, his batting average in the 30s and his wicket column deep enough to fill a phone screen. Axar Patel, who can bat with genuine violence in the middle order and bowl with metronomic control, has cemented himself as the second spinner in most conditions. Behind them, younger options keep emerging from the IPL's relentless talent factory.
Sundar's misfortune is architectural. He is an off-spinner in a system that already has Ashwin's colossal legacy baked into its selection memory — even after Ashwin's international retirement, the committee's mental model of "what the off-spinner's role looks like" was shaped by a man who took 500-plus Test wickets. Sundar's off-spin is effective, controlled, and occasionally sharp, but it is not Ashwin-level devastating. Nobody's is. The comparison is unfair, and yet it lingers in every selection meeting like a ghost who will not leave the boardroom.
According to Cricbuzz's analysis, Sundar has featured in India's playing XI in fewer than 40% of the matches for which he was part of the touring squad over the past three years. That number — fewer than four out of every ten games — tells the whole story of a career lived in the holding pattern.
Inside Talk
The chatter in Indian cricket circles, as India Herald has tracked it, is that Sundar's camp is quietly frustrated — not with the team management, which rates his skills highly, but with the structural reality that there is simply no room. Sources close to Tamil Nadu cricket circles suggest Sundar has been told, in so many words, that he is the "first replacement" in every format: the man who plays when Jadeja is resting, when Axar is injured, when a particular pitch demands an extra spinning option. First replacement sounds like a compliment until you realise it means you are permanently one phone call away from the XI and permanently one healthy teammate away from the bench.
The talk among IPL franchise strategists — who watch selection politics the way hedge-fund managers watch central bank signals — is that Sundar's versatility, ironically, makes him harder to pick, not easier. A specialist does one thing and forces the selector's hand: you either need a spinner or you don't. Sundar does three things — bats, bowls, fields — and that very breadth lets the selector always find a reason to pick someone else who does one of those things marginally better.
(This reflects industry chatter and unverified speculation, not confirmed fact.)
The Utility Paradox Indian Cricket Cannot Solve
This is where India Herald's read of Sundar's situation diverges from the standard "unlucky player" narrative. Sundar is not a victim of bad luck. He is a victim of a structural paradox that Indian cricket, for all its analytical sophistication, has never resolved: the system rewards specialists for selection but needs utility players to win tournaments.
Think about who actually rescues India in crises. At the Gabba in 2021, it was Sundar and Shardul Thakur — utility players thrown into the fire because the specialists were injured. In multiple T20 World Cup campaigns, it has been the flexible squad members — the ones who can bat up the order or bowl an extra over — who have papered over tactical cracks. Yet when the full-strength squad is announced, the utility players are the first to be dropped because the specialists are fit again.
This is not unique to cricket — it mirrors a truth in any high-performance field. The person who can do everything is valued less than the person who can do one thing spectacularly, right until the moment the specialist fails and the organisation desperately needs someone who can adapt. Sundar's career is a case study in that tension, and at 26, he is running out of the runway where "potential" is still a valid currency. By 28 or 29, the next generation of Tamil Nadu or Karnataka off-spinning all-rounders will emerge from IPL academies, and the conversation will shift from "Sundar deserves a longer run" to "has Sundar's window closed?"
The forward-looking question is sharp: can Sundar force permanence before the window narrows? His best path, according to former selectors speaking to The Hindu, may be to dominate one format so thoroughly that the committee cannot justify leaving him out — the way Jadeja made himself undroppable in Tests through sheer weight of runs and wickets over a sustained period. The worst path is to keep being good at everything and great at nothing in particular, because Indian cricket's depth will always find someone more specialised to fill each individual slot.
For a parallel in how India manages its most versatile cricketers, Harmanpreet Kaur's career offers a telling mirror — a player whose multi-dimensional talent sometimes worked against clear selection logic.
And for those who think this is purely an individual dilemma, consider this: India Herald's earlier analysis of Sundar's two-wickets-per-spell pattern showed that his consistency is precisely the kind that wins series but never makes headlines. He is the player who keeps the run rate at 3.2 an over while the strike bowler hunts for edges. Essential, invisible, and therefore perpetually undervalued.
[EMBED-SUGGESTION:tweet]
The Dinner-Table Number
Here is the fact worth carrying to your next cricket argument: Washington Sundar's combined batting-plus-bowling average differential in Tests — runs scored per dismissal minus runs conceded per wicket — is positive, placing him among the top ten all-rounders globally in the format over the past three years, according to ESPNcricinfo's statistical archives. He is, by this composite measure, a more effective Test all-rounder than several players who are automatic selections for their national teams. The difference? Those players do not have Jadeja and Axar sitting next to them in the dressing room.
More from India Herald
Key Takeaways
- Washington Sundar's exclusion is structural, not personal — India's all-rounder depth in 2026, featuring Jadeja and Axar Patel, is the most congested in world cricket, leaving Sundar as the perennial 'first replacement' across all three formats.
- Sundar has featured in fewer than 40% of playing XIs for squads he has been part of over the past three years, per Cricbuzz analysis — a statistical portrait of a career lived in the holding pattern between selection and the bench.
- His combined batting-plus-bowling average differential in Tests places him among the global top ten all-rounders over the past three years (ESPNcricinfo), yet he cannot command a guaranteed slot because Indian cricket's system rewards specialists over utility players — until a crisis forces the opposite.
By the Numbers
- Washington Sundar has featured in fewer than 40% of playing XIs in squads he has been part of over three years, per Cricbuzz
- His combined Test batting-plus-bowling average differential ranks among the global top 10 all-rounders over the past three years, per ESPNcricinfo
- Sundar's T20I economy rate remains among the tightest for any Indian spinner in the format's history, per ESPNcricinfo
The 5W+H: Who, What, When, Where, Why, How
- Who: Washington Sundar, 26-year-old Indian all-rounder from Tamil Nadu, currently part of India's multi-format squad pool.
- What: Despite proven performances with both bat and ball across all three formats, Sundar remains without a guaranteed place in any Indian playing XI, sparking a surge in search interest as fans question his omission.
- When: The selection debate has intensified through the 2025-26 international cycle, with Sundar's name trending following recent squad announcements in 2026.
- Where: India's international cricket setup, with selection decisions made by the BCCI's national selection committee.
- Why: India's unprecedented depth in the all-rounder category — featuring Ravindra Jadeja, Axar Patel, Ravichandran Ashwin's legacy, and emerging options — means Sundar competes not against mediocrity but against an embarrassment of riches.
- How: Sundar's utility — batting ability in the top six plus economical off-spin — paradoxically works against him: selectors can always justify a specialist over someone who does two things well rather than one thing supremely.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Washington Sundar not a regular in the Indian cricket team despite his all-round ability?
India's all-rounder slots are the most congested in world cricket. Ravindra Jadeja and Axar Patel hold the primary spinning all-rounder positions across formats, and Sundar's versatility — while valuable — means selectors can always justify picking a specialist who does one thing marginally better. He remains the 'first replacement' rather than first choice.
What are Washington Sundar's key stats across formats?
According to ESPNcricinfo, Sundar's Test batting average sits above 30, his T20I economy rate is among the tightest for any Indian spinner, and his combined batting-plus-bowling average differential ranks among the global top ten all-rounders in Tests over the past three years.
Can Washington Sundar still become a permanent fixture in the Indian team?
At 26, his window remains open but is narrowing. Former selectors, speaking to The Hindu, suggest his best path is to dominate one format so thoroughly that the selection committee cannot justify leaving him out — similar to how Jadeja made himself undroppable in Tests through sustained run-and-wicket accumulation.
How does Washington Sundar compare to Ravindra Jadeja and Axar Patel?
Sundar offers comparable versatility — batting ability in the top six and economical off-spin — but Jadeja's left-arm spin and batting longevity, and Axar's explosive middle-order hitting, give both a clearer role definition. Sundar's broader skill set paradoxically makes his role less defined in selectors' minds.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel