If true, the alleged statements attributed to Zakir Naik — that abusing women who do not follow the Islamic dress code is permissible, and that victims of rape and murder are to blame for their own fate — are not only deeply disturbing but morally reprehensible. Such remarks, if accurately quoted, reflect a dangerous and deeply flawed interpretation of religious teachings that promotes victim-blaming and fosters a culture of misogyny and violence. No belief system should be used to justify the abuse, harassment, or dehumanization of others, especially vulnerable individuals like women and girls. The very notion that victims bear responsibility for crimes committed against them is both cruel and legally indefensible.
Statements like these, whether made explicitly or implied, can have real-world consequences, particularly when they come from influential figures with a massive following. Zakir Naik is a well-known Islamic preacher with millions of followers across the globe, and his words carry significant weight among his supporters.
When such authority is used to promote regressive or harmful views, it can embolden extremists, deepen social divisions, and contribute to the normalization of gender-based violence. In societies already grappling with issues like patriarchy and systemic inequality, such rhetoric can seriously undermine efforts to promote justice, equality, and the safety of women.
Critics from both within and outside the Muslim world have long called for greater accountability and reform when it comes to interpretations of religious texts that perpetuate harm. islam, like all major religions, contains diverse schools of thought and interpretations, many of which strongly condemn violence and uphold the dignity of all human beings. To reduce a complex faith tradition to the statements of a single controversial figure is both unfair and misleading. However, it is equally crucial to challenge and expose those who misuse religion to justify oppression and cruelty. In any civilized society, moral clarity demands standing firmly against victim-blaming and the abuse of power under the guise of piety.
Statements like these, whether made explicitly or implied, can have real-world consequences, particularly when they come from influential figures with a massive following. Zakir Naik is a well-known Islamic preacher with millions of followers across the globe, and his words carry significant weight among his supporters.
When such authority is used to promote regressive or harmful views, it can embolden extremists, deepen social divisions, and contribute to the normalization of gender-based violence. In societies already grappling with issues like patriarchy and systemic inequality, such rhetoric can seriously undermine efforts to promote justice, equality, and the safety of women.Critics from both within and outside the Muslim world have long called for greater accountability and reform when it comes to interpretations of religious texts that perpetuate harm. islam, like all major religions, contains diverse schools of thought and interpretations, many of which strongly condemn violence and uphold the dignity of all human beings. To reduce a complex faith tradition to the statements of a single controversial figure is both unfair and misleading. However, it is equally crucial to challenge and expose those who misuse religion to justify oppression and cruelty. In any civilized society, moral clarity demands standing firmly against victim-blaming and the abuse of power under the guise of piety.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel