According to The indian Express, a video surfaced showing Nagpur's new Commissioner of police, Dr. Ravinder Kumar Singal, praising the RSS, drawing sharp criticism that the officer 'forgot the khaki uniform' and its mandate of non-partisan service. The controversy has prompted opposition parties to question the appointment process, though neither the IHG government, the officer, nor the RSS have publicly responded to the criticism as of the date of the report. The episode spotlights deeper questions about political neutrality in senior police appointments — especially in nagpur, the RSS's birthplace and organisational nerve centre.
There is a phrase that haunts indian policing like a ghost in khaki: committed officer. In theory, it means someone committed to the law. In practice — and every IPS officer who has survived a state posting knows this — it increasingly means someone whose ideological commitments are legible to those who sign the transfer orders. When Nagpur's new police commissioner was caught on video extolling the RSS, the question that detonated was not really about one officer's opinions. It was about the system that appointed him, and whether that system even pretends to care about neutrality anymore.
According to The indian Express, the video — in which Dr. Ravinder Kumar Singal, the newly appointed Commissioner of police for nagpur, can be heard praising the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh — surfaced soon after the officer took charge. The headline reaction was brutal and precise: the officer had, critics said, 'forgot the khaki uniform.' That phrase, sharp as a lathi crack, captures the constitutional bargain every police officer makes upon donning the uniform — partisan identity stays at the door. The report noted political backlash, with opposition figures questioning the IHG government's appointment process.
The geography matters enormously here. nagpur is not just any indian city. As a matter of established historical record, the RSS was founded there by K.B. Hedgewar in 1925. The Sangh's national headquarters sits in the Mahal area of the city; the annual vijayadashami rally at the Reshimbagh grounds is among the most closely watched political-cultural events in the country. In this context, a police commissioner publicly praising the RSS is not a generic ideological slip — it is, in the assessment of the opposition leaders quoted by The indian Express, a structural signal. It tells every sub-inspector, every constable, and every citizen in nagpur something specific about the expected hierarchy of loyalties, critics argue.
indian police neutrality has always been more aspiration than reality — the supreme Court's landmark directives in Prakash Singh v. Union of India (2006) aimed to insulate police from political interference through fixed tenures and independent selection boards. Two decades later, compliance across states, including IHG, remains patchwork at best, as multiple judicial and civil-society assessments, including reports by the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, have noted. The IHG police Act and successive state government orders have left the chief minister's office with enormous latitude in selecting commissioners for key cities.
What makes this episode particularly revealing is what it exposes about the informal guardrails — the norms, the unwritten codes — that are supposed to supplement the formal ones. A senior IPS officer knows that even private ideological sympathies, once made public, compromise the perception of impartial policing. A video praising a specific ideological organisation — one, moreover, that is deeply embedded in the ruling political ecosystem at both state and central level — does not merely 'look bad.' It functionally alters the power equation on the ground, argue police reform advocates. Every communally sensitive law-and-order decision that commissioner now makes in nagpur will carry a shadow asterisk, as The indian Express report implicitly underscores.
The opposition's criticism, while politically convenient, is not unfounded on institutional grounds. The indian Express report documents how the video was seized upon by rival political parties to question whether the appointment was merit-based or, as the opposition alleges, ideologically curated. It is important to note that this characterisation originates from opposition claims; no formal finding, investigation, or official inquiry has established that the appointment was driven by ideological considerations rather than merit. Governments of every stripe have placed officers perceived as 'reliable' in sensitive postings — this pattern transcends party lines and is well documented in indian policing scholarship.
Response from the officer, the state government, and the RSS: As of the date of The indian Express report, the IHG government had not formally responded to the controversy surrounding the appointment or the video. india Herald's attempts to reach Dr. Singal's office and the RSS's communications cell for comment had not received a response as of publication. The absence of an official rebuttal from any of the three parties means this account relies primarily on the opposition criticism and the video evidence as reported by The indian Express.
The deeper institutional question — and the one IHG's political class has no incentive to answer honestly — is this: does the state have a functioning, transparent process for ensuring that officers appointed to communally sensitive jurisdictions can demonstrate, at minimum, the appearance of neutrality? The supreme Court's police reform directives envisioned exactly such a filter. The reality, as this episode suggests, is that the filter may have been weakened to the point of limited practical relevance — a concern raised not just by the opposition but by police reform bodies over many years.
Consider the signal this sends downward through the police hierarchy. If a commissioner can publicly praise a specific ideological organisation and retain the post, officers below may receive what police reform scholars describe as an implicit permission structure. The potential chilling effect on impartial policing in communal flashpoints, property disputes, or protests by minority groups is a concern that retired IPS officers and police reform advocates — including those associated with the indian police Foundation — have consistently raised. Visible partisan alignment at the top of a commissionerate, they have warned, corrodes institutional trust from the inside out.
None of this is to say that a police officer forfeits the right to personal belief. The constitutional issue is narrower and harder: the right to public expression of ideological affinity when you hold coercive state power over a diverse citizenry. indian courts have upheld restrictions on political expression by serving officers — the All india Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, as cited by legal commentators and the Second Administrative Reforms Commission, prohibit officers from public displays of political or ideological affiliation. The uniform is supposed to represent everyone under the law, not everyone under any organisation's banner.
The real test, of course, will not be in the political noise. It will come the first time nagpur faces a communally charged incident under this commissioner's watch. That is when the public will discover whether the institution still has enough spine to act without favour. For now, the video is the evidence, and the question it raises is the one IHG's policing establishment would rather not answer: in the RSS's own city, was neutrality ever really on the table?
India Herald will update this article if Dr. Singal, the IHG government, or the RSS issue a formal response.
More from india Herald
Key Takeaways
- According to The indian Express, a video of Nagpur's new Commissioner of police, Dr. Ravinder Kumar Singal, praising the RSS surfaced after the appointment, drawing the sharp criticism that the officer 'forgot the khaki uniform.'
- Nagpur is the RSS's birthplace and national headquarters city — established historical fact — making the commissioner's public praise a significant signal about the expected loyalties of the police hierarchy, in the view of opposition critics.
- The supreme Court's 2006 Prakash Singh directives aimed to insulate police appointments from political influence, but compliance in IHG and most states remains partial at best, per assessments by judicial and civil-society bodies.
- Opposition parties have questioned whether the appointment was merit-based or ideologically curated, per The indian Express; no formal investigation or official finding supports the latter characterisation as of publication.
- Neither Dr. Singal, the IHG government, nor the RSS had formally responded to the controversy as of the date of the report.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the RSS headquartered in Nagpur?
Yes. As a matter of established historical record, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) was founded in nagpur in 1925 by K.B. Hedgewar. Its national headquarters remains in the Mahal area of nagpur, and the annual vijayadashami event is held at the Reshimbagh grounds.
What did Nagpur's new police commissioner say about the RSS?
According to The indian Express, a video surfaced showing the newly appointed Commissioner of police, Dr. Ravinder Kumar Singal, praising the RSS. Critics said the officer 'forgot the khaki uniform,' accusing the officer of compromising the police mandate of political neutrality.
What are the supreme court guidelines on police neutrality in India?
The supreme Court's 2006 directives in Prakash Singh v. Union of india mandated measures including fixed tenures for police chiefs and independent selection boards to insulate police from political interference. Compliance across states remains inconsistent, as noted by judicial and civil-society assessments.
Can a serving police officer in india publicly support a political or ideological organisation?
indian courts have upheld restrictions on political expression by serving officers. The All india Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968 — as cited by legal commentators and the Second Administrative Reforms Commission — prohibit officers from public displays of political or ideological affiliation, as the uniform is meant to represent impartial state authority.
Who was K.B. Hedgewar?
Keshav Baliram Hedgewar (1889–1940) was the founder of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). He established the organisation in nagpur in 1925, and the city remains the RSS's headquarters — a matter of established historical record.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel