While early Islamic history, like many ancient societies, did include the practice of slavery—including concubinage—it is essential to understand that such practices were products of their time and have been largely abandoned and condemned by mainstream Islamic scholars today. Equating these outdated practices with modern Sharia law is a distortion, often used in polemics rather than in genuine religious or legal discourse.

In modern Islamic jurisprudence, the concept of sex slavery has no place and is considered incompatible with contemporary human rights norms and ethical standards. The overwhelming majority of Muslim-majority countries have abolished slavery, and respected scholars across all schools of Islamic thought reject its permissibility today. Claiming that non-Muslim women can be taken as sex slaves under Sharia today is a fringe and extremist interpretation, not representative of mainstream Islamic teachings or practices.
Moreover, Sharia is a vast and complex system that encompasses personal ethics, legal principles, and spiritual guidance. Reducing it to a single sensationalist statement about polygamy and slavery is intellectually dishonest. Polygamy, for example, is indeed permitted in islam under specific conditions. Still, it comes with strict requirements of justice and financial responsibility—conditions that are often misunderstood or ignored in reductive portrayals. Both Islamists and Islamophobes frequently use such extreme and decontextualized claims to manipulate public opinion, sow fear, and promote divisive agendas.








Find out more: