Former U.S. President Donald Trump's latest remarks have once again stirred controversy in india, especially in the wake of prime minister Narendra Modi’s conspicuous silence on trump during a recent two-hour speech in the Lok Sabha. Just hours after Modi avoided naming trump while discussing foreign policy, trump boldly claimed that he had “stopped a war” between india and Pakistan—an assertion that implies a lack of control or assertiveness from india during that tense period.
Even more provocatively, trump threatened to impose a 25% tariff on indian goods, further straining the optics of diplomatic strength. For many indian netizens, this juxtaposition—of Modi’s silence and Trump’s brashness—reinforces a perception of India’s leadership being submissive on the global stage.
Social media erupted with criticism and disappointment, with countless users calling Modi’s approach “cowardly” and accusing him of lacking the spine to respond to Trump’s repeated claims and threats. Many pointed out that if any other country’s leader had made such statements, a strong and immediate rebuttal would have followed.
Instead, Modi’s restraint is being interpreted by critics as a failure to uphold national dignity. The outrage isn’t just about Trump’s tone—it’s about what Modi’s silence signals to the world. In the eyes of the public, a powerful, self-respecting nation does not let such statements go unchallenged, especially when they involve matters of war, sovereignty, and economic aggression.
This incident adds to a growing sentiment among a section of the indian populace that Modi’s foreign policy, while praised for pageantry and high-profile summits, often lacks substance when it comes to defending India’s core interests. Whether it’s China’s aggression at the border, interference from U.S. leaders, or now the threat of economic penalties, Modi’s calibrated silence is starting to be perceived as weakness rather than diplomacy. The expectation from a leader—especially one who projects global influence—is to firmly and publicly defend national pride. In failing to do so, Modi has opened the door for both international undermining and domestic disillusionment.
Even more provocatively, trump threatened to impose a 25% tariff on indian goods, further straining the optics of diplomatic strength. For many indian netizens, this juxtaposition—of Modi’s silence and Trump’s brashness—reinforces a perception of India’s leadership being submissive on the global stage.
Social media erupted with criticism and disappointment, with countless users calling Modi’s approach “cowardly” and accusing him of lacking the spine to respond to Trump’s repeated claims and threats. Many pointed out that if any other country’s leader had made such statements, a strong and immediate rebuttal would have followed.
Instead, Modi’s restraint is being interpreted by critics as a failure to uphold national dignity. The outrage isn’t just about Trump’s tone—it’s about what Modi’s silence signals to the world. In the eyes of the public, a powerful, self-respecting nation does not let such statements go unchallenged, especially when they involve matters of war, sovereignty, and economic aggression.
This incident adds to a growing sentiment among a section of the indian populace that Modi’s foreign policy, while praised for pageantry and high-profile summits, often lacks substance when it comes to defending India’s core interests. Whether it’s China’s aggression at the border, interference from U.S. leaders, or now the threat of economic penalties, Modi’s calibrated silence is starting to be perceived as weakness rather than diplomacy. The expectation from a leader—especially one who projects global influence—is to firmly and publicly defend national pride. In failing to do so, Modi has opened the door for both international undermining and domestic disillusionment.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel