Global Cinema or God-Cinema? Can Tollywood Make a Global Blockbuster Without Leaning on Hindu Icons?
indian cinema is at a crossroads. On one side, the world is watching—waiting for the next breakout indian epic that isn’t chained to mythology. On the other hand, our biggest directors seem unable to resist dipping into the same well of Hindu symbolism, divine imagery, and mythological metaphors. And with SS Rajamouli’s Varanasi reveal—complete with a blood-soaked mahesh babu on Nandi—an old debate explodes again: Is tollywood creating cinema… or repackaging religion?
THE NEVER-ENDING RETURN TO HINDU MYTHOLOGY
In recent years, tollywood has developed a pattern—one that’s becoming hard to ignore.
Films draw heavily from:
Lord Rama
Hanuman
Shiva
and assorted mythological themes, aesthetics, and metaphors
Even when a movie is marketed as “global,” “universal,” or “pan-world,” the visual language often circles back to religious symbolism. It’s not inherently wrong to use mythology—cinema has always borrowed from culture—but when it becomes a formula, audiences start questioning its intent.
RAJAMOULI ENTERS THE CROSSHAIRS
SS Rajamouli, widely celebrated for elevating indian cinema to international fame, now finds himself in the center of this recurring debate.
With Varanasi, the imagery is unmistakable:
Trident
Nandi
Bloodied divine warrior visual
A setting deeply rooted in Hindu spirituality
Fans call it cultural pride. Critics call it creative dependency.
But one thing is clear—Rajamouli’s myth-heavy approach has reignited the conversation about whether our biggest filmmakers are leaning too often on Hindu iconography to generate mass hype.
THE GLOBAL VS. RELIGIOUS IDENTITY DILEMMA
Rajamouli has repeatedly spoken about wanting to make a global film—something that can travel beyond borders.
But the question arises:
If your story relies so heavily on specific religious imagery, can it truly appeal to a global, neutral audience?
Hollywood’s Indiana Jones may touch Christian artifacts, but the films don’t function as religious narratives. They use mythology as a backdrop—not the backbone.
Global cinema thrives on universality.
Indian big-budget films increasingly anchor themselves in faith-driven symbolism.
So where should the line be drawn?
THE INDUSTRY’S REPEATED PLAYBOOK
The pattern in recent megafilms is unmistakable:
• Pick a Hindu deity or a familiar mythological element
• Repackage it with high-end VFX
• Market it as cultural pride
• watch the hype take care of the rest
This isn’t storytelling—it’s strategic sensationalism.
It works, yes.
But it also raises a deeper concern:
Are filmmakers choosing mythology because it genuinely enriches the narrative, or because it guarantees emotional investment and box-office impact?
THE ART VS. ALGORITHM QUESTION
Filmmakers are artists.
But in today’s cinema, they are also brands feeding algorithms.
Mythology trends.
Devotional visuals trend.
Religious symbolism trends.
But art is supposed to evolve—challenge—surprise.
Instead, we are witnessing a recycling loop where mythological imagery becomes shorthand for “mass appeal.”
Is this sincere storytelling?
Or is it a shortcut?
THE audience HAS A RIGHT TO ASK
cinema doesn’t—and shouldn’t—avoid religion.
Faith is an inseparable part of culture.
But when a pattern becomes too predictable, audiences have every right to question it.
Not out of hostility.
Not out of disrespect.
But out of a desire to see indian cinema grow beyond a single creative playbook.
If india wants a global breakout film on the scale of Avatar, Gladiator, or Dune, we may need to step outside the comfort zone of deity-led narratives.
THE FINAL QUESTION: WHAT DOES indian cinema REALLY WANT TO BE?
A celebration of mythology?
A global cinematic force?
Or a hybrid of both—without overdependence on familiar religious cues?
Rajamouli’s Varanasi may end up being brilliant.
But the debate it revived is bigger than any one film:
Is indian cinema telling new stories… or remixing ancient ones for guaranteed applause?
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel