⚡WHEN WORDS REPLACE WORK
When Nirmala Sitharaman says the budget will place a “special emphasis on developing infrastructure in cities,” it lands less like a promise and more like a confession.
Because the obvious follow-up writes itself: what exactly were the last 12 years?
If cities need special emphasis now, then by definition, they were de-emphasised before. And that indictment isn’t coming from critics — it’s embedded in the government’s own phrasing.
1️⃣ IF CITIES NEED “SPECIAL EMPHASIS” NOW, THEY WERE NEGLECTED BEFORE
Budgets are moral documents. They reveal priorities.
Urban india didn’t wake up broken overnight. Congestion, flooding, housing stress, transit collapse, pollution, and crumbling civic services are the result of long-term neglect, not sudden misfortune.
Calling for emphasis now quietly admits what residents already know: cities were left to rot while slogans did the heavy lifting.
2️⃣ WHAT WERE “SMART CITIES” THEN — A BRAND CAMPAIGN?
For nearly a decade, Smart Cities Mission was sold as a transformational urban reform.
What did it deliver on the ground?
Isolated beautification pockets
Command centres without command
Tender-driven optics over system-wide fixes
Smart Cities became a showroom model — impressive in brochures, irrelevant to the daily misery of water shortages, broken footpaths, and collapsing public transport.
If cities need fresh emphasis today, then Smart Cities failed yesterday.
3️⃣ A DECADE OF URBAN DECAY DIDN’T HAPPEN BY ACCIDENT
Cities weren’t starved because the government didn’t know better. They were starved because urban reform is politically inconvenient.
Cities demand empowered local governments
They require predictable municipal finance
They need boring, structural reform — not ribbon-cutting
Instead, urban india was treated like a backdrop for press conferences, not the engine of India’s economy.
4️⃣ THIS BUDGET IS LONG ON ADJECTIVES, SHORT ON REFORM
Every year, the same script:
“Transformative”
“Visionary”
“Special emphasis”
“Mission mode”
And every year, the same omissions:
No real municipal fiscal autonomy
No property tax reform
No metropolitan governance overhaul
No mass transit financing clarity
PR words don’t fix drainage.
Hashtags don’t decongest roads.
5️⃣ GODI media WILL SELL THE HEADLINE — CITIES WILL PAY THE PRICE
By tonight, the cheer squad will declare:
“Massive push for urban infrastructure!”
But residents will still:
Sit in traffic for hours
Watch streets flood after 20 minutes of rain
Pay more for worse services
Depend on private fixes for public failures
That gap between headline and reality is no longer accidental — it’s the model.
6️⃣ REAL URBAN REFORM WAS NEVER EVEN ATTEMPTED
A serious city-first budget would have:
Strengthened elected city governments
Guaranteed long-term funding streams
Linked growth to livability metrics
Treated cities as economic systems, not photo-ops
Instead, we got another language upgrade, not a policy one.
🧨 FINAL WORD: “SPECIAL EMPHASIS” IS AN ADMISSION OF FAILURE
When a government announces urgency after a decade in power, it isn’t visionary — it’s late.
Urban india didn’t need new buzzwords.
It needed attention when it still mattered.
This budget doesn’t offer reform.
It offers regret, rebranded as resolve.
And cities — once again — are expected to survive on slogans.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel