Supreme court of India: Why J. B. Pardiwala Said “Lawyer Sir, Don’t Go”


Background of the Case


The matter was heard by Justice J.B. Pardiwala in the supreme Court.


It involved a mechanical engineer from the Border Roads Task Force seeking reinstatement and pending salary dues.


A high court order had directed that he be paid approximately ₹37 lakh (3.7 million rupees).


Courtroom Proceedings Take an Unexpected Turn


When Justice Pardiwala asked a simple question — whether the payment had been received — the petitioner failed to give a direct response.


Instead, he began offering explanations about not receiving funds in his kolkata bank account.


The department’s counsel clarified that the amount had already been transferred to the petitioner’s Rajouri bank account.


Under further questioning, the petitioner admitted that the money had indeed been credited to his Rajouri account.


Repeated Interruptions in Court


Justice Pardiwala, known for his patience and calm demeanor, listened carefully to the arguments.


However, as the judge began dictating the order, the petitioner repeatedly interrupted.


Despite several warnings and attempts to reason with him, the petitioner continued arguing.


“Shut Your Mouth” Remark


At this point, Justice Pardiwala sternly told the petitioner to “shut your mouth and let me dictate the order.”


The judge observed that such behavior reflected poorly on the petitioner’s suitability for his professional role.


The remark underscored the importance of maintaining decorum in court proceedings.


Why the Judge Stopped the Lawyer


Earlier in the hearing, the petitioner’s lawyer appeared ready to step away.


Justice Pardiwala asked him to stay, saying, “Lawyer sir, don’t go, I’ll need you.”


The statement later proved significant, as the client’s conduct demonstrated the necessity of legal guidance.


The judge implied that when litigants rely on personal narratives instead of legal arguments, it is the lawyer’s role to maintain order and clarity.


The incident highlights both courtroom discipline and the critical role advocates play in guiding their clients during judicial proceedings.


Disclaimer:


The information contained in this article is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure accuracy, we make no warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the content. Any reliance you place on the information is strictly at your own risk. The views, opinions, or claims expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any organization mentioned. We disclaim any liability for any loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use of this article.

Find out more: