BJP spokesperson Prem Shukla Calling Congress spokesperson's mother 'Randi' on Live TV - Disgusting!
The alleged incident involving bjp spokesperson prem Shukla using the derogatory term "Randi" (a deeply offensive hindi slur for a woman, implying she is a prostitute) against a congress spokesperson's mother on live television is both disturbing and unacceptable. Such language has no place in any civil discourse, let alone during a nationally broadcast political debate. When political representatives descend into personal abuse and misogynistic insults, it reflects a dangerous erosion of democratic values, decency, and public accountability. This isn’t just an insult to one individual—it’s an insult to every viewer who expects elected representatives and their affiliates to uphold some standard of conduct.
What makes the situation even more troubling is the perceived impunity with which such statements are made. The normalization of vulgar, gendered abuse in political debates—especially against women or references to women—exposes the hypocrisy within certain political narratives. When the same leaders publicly speak about preserving cultural values, protecting women, or engaging in symbolic gestures like distributing sindoor (vermilion, a symbol of marital sanctity in Hindu tradition), yet behave in such degrading ways on public platforms, it becomes a glaring contradiction. These acts reveal that for some, traditional values are used more as a political costume than a genuine belief.
The larger issue at hand is not just individual misconduct, but the cultural environment that allows such language to go unchecked. Political parties must take clear and public action against any spokesperson or leader who engages in abusive or sexist language, regardless of party affiliation. If no consequences follow such incidents, it sends a message that power absolves one from accountability. For democracy to function with dignity, the political debate must remain robust but respectful—focused on policies and ideologies, not on degrading personal attacks. The indian public deserves better than spectacle and slander; it deserves leadership that reflects the values it claims to protect.
What makes the situation even more troubling is the perceived impunity with which such statements are made. The normalization of vulgar, gendered abuse in political debates—especially against women or references to women—exposes the hypocrisy within certain political narratives. When the same leaders publicly speak about preserving cultural values, protecting women, or engaging in symbolic gestures like distributing sindoor (vermilion, a symbol of marital sanctity in Hindu tradition), yet behave in such degrading ways on public platforms, it becomes a glaring contradiction. These acts reveal that for some, traditional values are used more as a political costume than a genuine belief.
The larger issue at hand is not just individual misconduct, but the cultural environment that allows such language to go unchecked. Political parties must take clear and public action against any spokesperson or leader who engages in abusive or sexist language, regardless of party affiliation. If no consequences follow such incidents, it sends a message that power absolves one from accountability. For democracy to function with dignity, the political debate must remain robust but respectful—focused on policies and ideologies, not on degrading personal attacks. The indian public deserves better than spectacle and slander; it deserves leadership that reflects the values it claims to protect.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel