Trisha once celebrated for her strong, graceful, and often empowering roles in South indian cinema, is currently facing criticism from a section of her fan base and netizens over the nature of her recent film choices. With Vidamuyarchi, where she reportedly portrays a woman entangled in an affair, GOAT, where she is said to have an “item” or glam-centric role, and Thug Life, where her character is rumored to be involved in an unconventional romantic track with an older married man, fans feel that the roles lack the depth and dignity they’ve come to associate with the actress over her two-decade-long career. Many are questioning her decision to take on what they perceive as “cheap” or “derogatory” roles, especially at a time when senior actresses are exploring more nuanced and substantial characters.
The frustration from her fan base largely stems from the dissonance between Trisha’s public image and the recent characters she's been associated with. As someone who has portrayed strong, relatable women in films like 96 and Abhiyum Naanum, fans had hoped that she would continue to carve a space for mature, layered roles for women in the industry. Instead, these newer portrayals are being seen by some as regressive or sensationalist, seemingly crafted more for shock value or mass appeal than meaningful storytelling. The criticism reflects a larger concern about how female actors, especially those with established careers, are boxed into overly stylized or morally grey roles under the guise of “reinvention.”
However, it’s also worth noting that the film industry is changing, and many actors are experimenting with roles that challenge societal norms and character stereotypes. Trisha, like many of her peers, maybe using these characters to break free from typecasting and to explore new dimensions in performance. The final verdict will ultimately depend on the treatment of these characters in the full context of the films. While initial reactions may be negative based on trailers or rumors, Trisha’s performances have often won over critics and audiences alike in the past. Whether these roles will tarnish or enrich her legacy remains to be seen when the films are released in full.
The frustration from her fan base largely stems from the dissonance between Trisha’s public image and the recent characters she's been associated with. As someone who has portrayed strong, relatable women in films like 96 and Abhiyum Naanum, fans had hoped that she would continue to carve a space for mature, layered roles for women in the industry. Instead, these newer portrayals are being seen by some as regressive or sensationalist, seemingly crafted more for shock value or mass appeal than meaningful storytelling. The criticism reflects a larger concern about how female actors, especially those with established careers, are boxed into overly stylized or morally grey roles under the guise of “reinvention.”
However, it’s also worth noting that the film industry is changing, and many actors are experimenting with roles that challenge societal norms and character stereotypes. Trisha, like many of her peers, maybe using these characters to break free from typecasting and to explore new dimensions in performance. The final verdict will ultimately depend on the treatment of these characters in the full context of the films. While initial reactions may be negative based on trailers or rumors, Trisha’s performances have often won over critics and audiences alike in the past. Whether these roles will tarnish or enrich her legacy remains to be seen when the films are released in full.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel