
However, the response from the karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce (KFCC) has been equally resolute. The KFCC publicly dismissed Haasan’s legal move, stating, “Let him go to court or wherever he wants. We don’t care.” Their stance remains clear: unless kamal haasan issues an apology, Thug Life will not be allowed to screen in Karnataka. This hardline approach underscores the power regional film bodies hold over theatrical distribution, and how cultural sensitivities continue to influence commercial cinema. With kannada pride at the core of the dispute, the KFCC has made it a matter of regional respect rather than merely a business decision.
Ultimately, as some have pointed out, it all boils down to money and market dynamics. If no local distributor or theatre owner steps forward to acquire Thug Life for the karnataka circuit, legal battles may be irrelevant. The commercial viability of any film hinges on buyers, exhibitors, and audience reception, and without access to one of India’s significant film markets, Thug Life faces a real challenge. While Kamal Haasan's legal strategy may uphold his principle of free expression, the economic reality remains that without reconciliation or compromise, the film could face a significant loss in revenue and regional reach.