Prior to the 2019 general elections, YS vivekananda reddy was brutally murdered, drawing widespread attention. The supreme court gave the cbi, which is conducting the investigation, a deadline after this case through a number of twists and turns over the past couple of years.

Now that Viveka's second wife has entered the picture, the case has taken a new dramatic turn. She claims to be a member of the Muslim minority and wants a piece of Viveka's real estate. Sunitha, Viveka's daughter, is posing challenges for us, and we are prepared for a court fight, the second wife of Viveka's lawyer told the media.


How did she appear so unexpectedly in this case and the scene is the main mystery. Who is behind her and what was she doing all this time? Shaik Shameem is Viveka's second spouse, and earlier in the day, her representative gave a press statement. The attorney continued by saying that a petition based on Viveka's will would be submitted to the telangana High Court.

In order to determine whether Shameem's son Shaik Shahenshah is linked to Viveka, her attorney said that they are prepared for a dna test. She continued by saying that she will seek the telangana High court to grant the appropriate share in accordance with Viveka's will. According to observers, it is obvious that this case will turn around once more.

The second wife of Viveka was revealed by kadapa mp YS avinash Reddy, it should be noted. avinash Reddy stated during his fifth appearance before the cbi that he may have been assassinated as a result of a personal dispute between Viveka's daughter Dr. Sunitha reddy and Viveka's second wife Shameem.

With Shameem entering the picture, many doubts start to surface. Since Viveka was assassinated four years ago, Shameem or her family have never been before the media. Shameem is suddenly appearing on the tv as the mp avinash case is taking centre stage. It is interesting that Viveka's murder is being discussed in judicial circles as being the work of powerful individuals. What about them? Is this a ploy to further derail the case?




Find out more: