Grok AI highlights a comparison between India's economic performance during the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) regime (2004–2014) and the current situation under the bharatiya janata party (BJP)-led government. During the UPA years, india experienced robust GDP growth, often exceeding 8% annually. This period was marked by a global commodities boom, strong consumer demand, and relatively low fiscal deficits, especially in the first UPA term (2004–2009). Additionally, India's foreign exchange reserves grew substantially, providing a strong buffer against external shocks. Per capita income also rose steadily, reflecting improved living standards across various income groups.
In contrast, the current bjp era has been met with mixed economic results. While there have been periods of strong growth, particularly before the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy has also seen major disruptions. These include demonetization in 2016, the rollout of the Goods and services Tax (GST), and the pandemic-related slowdown. Critics argue that these policies, especially demonetization, caused significant short-term economic distress, particularly for the informal sector. Though India's GDP has rebounded post-COVID, concerns persist regarding high inflation, unemployment, and growing fiscal deficits. External debt has more than doubled to $635.3 billion, raising questions about long-term debt sustainability, even though a substantial portion is still considered manageable relative to GDP.
Supporters of the bjp government counter these criticisms by pointing to improvements in infrastructure, wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW'>digital payments, tax compliance, and a more assertive global economic posture. However, critics maintain that these benefits have not translated into broad-based economic gains for the average citizen. The debate over economic stewardship remains politically charged, with each side presenting selective metrics to bolster their case. Ultimately, both periods have their strengths and flaws, and a nuanced evaluation requires accounting for global economic conditions, domestic policy choices, and structural factors shaping India’s long-term development.
In contrast, the current bjp era has been met with mixed economic results. While there have been periods of strong growth, particularly before the COVID-19 pandemic, the economy has also seen major disruptions. These include demonetization in 2016, the rollout of the Goods and services Tax (GST), and the pandemic-related slowdown. Critics argue that these policies, especially demonetization, caused significant short-term economic distress, particularly for the informal sector. Though India's GDP has rebounded post-COVID, concerns persist regarding high inflation, unemployment, and growing fiscal deficits. External debt has more than doubled to $635.3 billion, raising questions about long-term debt sustainability, even though a substantial portion is still considered manageable relative to GDP.
Supporters of the bjp government counter these criticisms by pointing to improvements in infrastructure, wallet PLATFORM' target='_blank' title='digital-Latest Updates, Photos, Videos are a click away, CLICK NOW'>digital payments, tax compliance, and a more assertive global economic posture. However, critics maintain that these benefits have not translated into broad-based economic gains for the average citizen. The debate over economic stewardship remains politically charged, with each side presenting selective metrics to bolster their case. Ultimately, both periods have their strengths and flaws, and a nuanced evaluation requires accounting for global economic conditions, domestic policy choices, and structural factors shaping India’s long-term development.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel