After making a false statement at the most recent niti aayog meeting, part-time politician Vijay found himself under fire once more. In an attack on the central government, which is led by the bharatiya janata party, Vijay said that "several Chief Ministers from non-BJP ruled states had boycotted the niti aayog meeting." His assertion is untrue, though, as there were actually just three opposition chief ministers there.

The DMK administration was attacked by Vijay for attending the 10th niti aayog meeting on May 24, 2025, claiming that their attendance was politically motivated and intended to protect them from recent Enforcement Directorate (ED) activities.
 
Vijay, who hopes to be the next chief minister of tamil Nadu, received a lot of criticism for this mistake.  N. chandrababu naidu of andhra pradesh, M.K. stalin of tamil Nadu, revanth reddy of Telangana, Sukhvinder Sukhu of Himachal Pradesh, and bhagwant mann of punjab were among the important leaders who attended the niti aayog meeting, notwithstanding what he said.  The chief minister of andhra pradesh is the only one of them who supports the BJP-led NDA.

NDA allies nitish kumar (Bihar) and N. Rangasamy (Puducherry) were among the three opposition chief ministers who did not attend the session: mamata banerjee (West Bengal), Siddaramaiah (Karnataka), and pinarayi vijayan (Kerala). Vijay's broad assertion was swiftly criticized for being deceptive in spite of these figures.

In an attempt to shield the party's first family from recent ED searches, Vijay implied on his official X account that the DMK's attendance at the meeting was more about personal interests than administration.  Many people questioned the political maturity and veracity of his remarks, and his response was extensively ridiculed online.

"The DMK leadership has mortgaged the pride of tamil Nadu, bowed down, surrendered, and sought refuge with the Union bjp government for the sake of family interests," he stated.

We made it plain at our Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam's first state convention that the governing, dishonest, and hypocritical DMK was our political enemy at the state level and the polarizing, policy-driven bjp was our intellectual enemy at the federal level. We have continuously called attention to and exposed these ruling parties' anti-people policies.

We also brought up the secret agreement between the DMK and the bjp when the previous partnership between the AIADMK and the bjp was restored.  Similarly, we had said that if someone implicated in corruption is targeted, they quickly flee to delhi, where everything is simply hushed up as though they had never committed any wrongdoing.  Following a number of ministers, tamil Nadu chief minister M.K. Stalin's recent visit to delhi appears to support that.

In the TASMAC corruption case, searches were recently performed at the homes of the TASMAC Managing director and people closely associated with the family of the DMK leadership following the Enforcement Directorate (ED) raids in March.

During this time, the tamil Nadu government appealed to the supreme court to halt the ED's probe into TASMAC, and they were successful in getting an interim stay.  However, because it is not a permanent relief, M.K. stalin, the chief minister of the publicity-driven DMK government, has been forced to speak wherever the probe may be put on hold.  For that reason, the niti aayog meeting was held.

When the same niti aayog meeting took place in delhi last year, the chief minister made a video to justify his absence. The justifications he offered back then are still valid now. Why come this year by yourself if that's the case? The ED's pressure is the only explanation!

M.K. stalin used the niti aayog meeting as a pretense to travel to delhi after realizing that ED acts are like a snake coiling around the foot and that a corruption case worth ₹1,000 crore could endanger his family.  He met with the prime minister separately as well.

Is it really and honestly possible for chief minister stalin to say that he did not bring up the ED raids, the current cases, or his family's situation with the prime minister during that meeting?

Furthermore, given that stalin came seeking safety, how could the bjp, which genuinely opposes the DMK politically and intellectually, have welcomed him with such warmth and friendliness? This just serves to support our earlier claim that this is an example of these two parties' clandestine partnership.

A picture from the niti aayog meeting was made public in this regard.  When you examine it closely, you can see that the secret is out. andhra pradesh chief minister chandrababu naidu, who publicly supports the bjp, is pictured in the front row.  Stalin, the chief minister of tamil Nadu, is positioned on the other side of the same row. What does this signify? One is given preference for an open alliance, while the other is given preference for a covert one. That's the truth, isn't it?

Despite being portrayed as a normal occurrence, this blatantly reveals the DMK and BJP's great political agreement and backroom collaboration.  That is the larger truth that underlies everything.

Several chief ministers from states that are not BJP-ruled have boycotted the niti aayog meeting in protest of the Union bjp government's dishonest actions.

Find out more: