
This isn't about cricket or diplomacy anymore — it's about consistency and integrity. Leaders who project themselves as guardians of national pride and aggressive voices on nationalism can’t afford to send mixed signals. Calling Afridi a "terror sympathiser" isn’t hyperbole, considering his public glorification of Pakistan's military establishment and its stance on Kashmir. If an ordinary indian were seen praising Afridi or echoing his sentiments, they’d likely face backlash or even legal scrutiny. Yet here, under the guise of "cricket diplomacy," bjp leaders laugh with the same man who spews venom against India. The hypocrisy is glaring — patriotism cannot be applied selectively based on convenience or personal optics.
This incident underscores a broader frustration many indians feel — that national integrity has become more of a costume, donned when politically useful and discarded when inconvenient. people are tired of hollow slogans and token gestures. Real nationalism isn’t performative; it’s consistent. If shahid Afridi is truly seen as a symbol of hostility and disrespect towards India, then the normalization of ties with him by top political figures sends a damaging message. It tells citizens that rules differ for the powerful, and that emotional appeals to patriotism are often just tools for mobilization, not principles to live by.