The tweet from @MrDemocratic_ features a video clip from a discussion involving journalist Rajdeep Sardesai and another individual, where Sardesai recounts a story about amit Shah's first electoral victory. According to the narrative, Shah, while part of the akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) in Gujarat, faced a college election against a National Students' Union of india (NSUI) candidate who was a woman.
To secure his win, Shah and his group allegedly contacted the parents of female students, convincing them not to allow their daughters to vote, under the pretext that their participation could lead to disaster. This strategy reportedly resulted in many women not voting, ultimately leading to Shah's victory in that election.
The tweet frames this story as an exposure of amit Shah's early political tactics, suggesting a pattern of unethical behavior that allegedly continues in his current political strategies. The accompanying text claims that Shah won his first election through a "scam" and implies that he still employs similar methods to win elections, labeling them as unethical. This narrative is part of a broader critique of Shah's political career, highlighting concerns over voter suppression and manipulation.
The discussion around this tweet is set against the backdrop of recent political events, including amit Shah's accusations against the congress party in the Rajya Sabha, where he claimed they treated the Constitution as "private property." This context adds to the polarization, with the tweet's content likely resonating with those critical of Shah's political methods, while also sparking debate about the veracity and fairness of such allegations. The story, whether accurate or not, underscores the intense scrutiny and controversy surrounding Shah's political ascent and tactics.
To secure his win, Shah and his group allegedly contacted the parents of female students, convincing them not to allow their daughters to vote, under the pretext that their participation could lead to disaster. This strategy reportedly resulted in many women not voting, ultimately leading to Shah's victory in that election.
The tweet frames this story as an exposure of amit Shah's early political tactics, suggesting a pattern of unethical behavior that allegedly continues in his current political strategies. The accompanying text claims that Shah won his first election through a "scam" and implies that he still employs similar methods to win elections, labeling them as unethical. This narrative is part of a broader critique of Shah's political career, highlighting concerns over voter suppression and manipulation.The discussion around this tweet is set against the backdrop of recent political events, including amit Shah's accusations against the congress party in the Rajya Sabha, where he claimed they treated the Constitution as "private property." This context adds to the polarization, with the tweet's content likely resonating with those critical of Shah's political methods, while also sparking debate about the veracity and fairness of such allegations. The story, whether accurate or not, underscores the intense scrutiny and controversy surrounding Shah's political ascent and tactics.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel