indian cricket is the richest in the world. bcci swims in billions of dollars, owns global cricket politics, and dominates the ICC. But the moment you turn on your TV?
The broadcast looks like it's trapped in a time machine from 2010.
Meanwhile, cricket australia delivers visuals so sharp you can count the stitches on the ball in 4K HDR. The difference is humiliating. And the worst part? BCCI can easily fix it — they just don’t.
Here’s the brutal breakdown of why indian cricket broadcasts suck… and the truth will make every indian fan furious.
1. australia Broadcasts in Native 4K HDR. india Still Serves 1080i Like Its Doordarshan Era.
cricket australia streams every home match in crisp 4K HDR with buttery-smooth 50p motion.
BCCI?
Still locked at 1080i, an outdated format known for shaky motion, interlacing lines, and mushy detail.
It’s 2025. Even YouTubers shoot better quality than the board running the world’s largest cricket ecosystem.
2. CA Uses Next-Gen 12G SDI & IP OB Systems. bcci Still Uses 10-Year-Old HD Flypacks.
Australia’s OB trucks are cutting-edge:
12G SDI pipelines
IP-based switching
Native 4K infrastructure
India?
A patchwork of aging HD flypacks designed when the iphone 5 was new. No surprise the outcome looks like a stretched HD feed, not a premium sports broadcast.
3. CA’s Cameras Are Beastly 4K Machines. bcci Still Points Older HD Cams at the Action.
Sony HDC-4300 & HDC-5500 true 4K cameras
300 fps high-speed slow-mo
600 fps ultra-motion
BCCI?
Older HD cameras, softer glass, lower frame rates — meaning less detail, weaker slow-mos, and blurrier action.
Sometimes india doesn’t even deploy a single ultra-motion cam for a whole series.
4. australia Tracks Seam, Swing & Spin Better Because They Use More Cameras and Faster Sampling.
CA runs a six-camera high-speed seam-tracking system, capturing every micro-movement of the ball.
BCCI?
Fewer angles + lower sampling = ball tracking that looks flat, laggy, and often inaccurate.
Hawk-Eye is only as good as the cameras feeding it. And india feeds it scraps.
5. CA Has a 100-Camera 360° Replay System. india Still Cuts Basic HD Replays.
Australia’s 360° replay system lets viewers see the game as if they’re inside it.
India?
A handful of match cameras cut into basic HD replays with limited angles.
No wonder every big decision turns into a X debate about the “bad angle” and “grainy zoom-in.”
6. australia Has Bigger, Better, and Highly Specialised Technical Crews. bcci Keeps It Minimal.
CA invests in:
Dedicated shaders
Dedicated engineers
Dedicated replay specialists
Larger camera teams
bcci trims its crew sizes to reduce per-match cost, and it shows:
Inconsistent colors
Washed-out shots
Delayed replays
Uneven camera control
7. CA Works in HDR. bcci Still Chains Everything to SDR.
HDR = deeper blacks, clean highlights, true dynamic range.
SDR = crushed shadows, blown-out bright spots, flat picture.
Cricket australia embraces HDR for every match.
India forces everything through the SDR funnel.
Result: indian cricket looks dull even before compression kicks in.
8. CA Outputs a Clean master Feed. bcci Pushes a Highly Compressed Feed From the Start.
australia → Clean, high-quality 4K master feed → Broadcasters
India → Already-compressed 1080i feed → tv channels → apps → viewers
This chain kills quality at every hop. By the time the viewer sees it, the picture looks smeared.
9. CA Tests & Calibrates Extensively. india Often Rushes Setup.
australia runs:
Pre-match lens tests
Color/shade calibration
Replay system checks
India?
The setup is often completed just hours before the toss.
That's why:
The white ball looks blown out at night
Grass color changes between cameras
Replay timing looks off
10. The Biggest Proof: ICC Broadcast Inside india Looked Better Than BCCI’s Own Productions.
Every indian saw it.
During the 2023 World Cup:
Same stadium. Same lighting. Same pitch. Same weather.
But the broadcast suddenly looked world-class.
Why?
Because ICC outsourced to a top-tier international production team, not BCCI's usual ecosystem.
This single comparison absolutely destroys every excuse.
THE FINAL VERDICT: bcci HAS THE MONEY — THEY JUST DON’T CARE.
40% of ICC revenue
₹720 crore per year in home broadcast money
$6 billion from IPL media rights
Hundreds of millions in sponsorships
But for indian fans?
No 4K. No HDR. No high-speed magic. No modern infrastructure.
Just recycled HD tech from the previous decade.
cricket australia invests because it respects viewers.
BCCI doesn’t — because they know fans will watch no matter what.
CLOSING PUNCH
indian cricket fans deserve world-class broadcast quality.
India is the financial powerhouse of cricket.
But until bcci decides fans matter…
Indian cricket will keep looking like it’s stuck in 2012 while the rest of the world moves ahead.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel