A video was posted on X, showcasing Shanghai's stunning nighttime skyline. The video, which spans 19.85 seconds, highlights the city's architectural marvels and advanced infrastructure, drawing a contrast between China's meritocratic system and the 78 years of reservation policies in India. The post, titled "78 years of Reservation Vs 78 years of Meritocracy," invites viewers to consider the implications of these differing approaches on national development.

The video begins with a sweeping view of Shanghai's skyline at dusk, featuring iconic structures such as the shanghai Tower, the Oriental Pearl Tower, and the shanghai World Financial Center. The cityscape is illuminated with vibrant lights, creating a mesmerizing display against the backdrop of a pink and purple sky. The camera pans across the Huangpu River, capturing the reflections of the skyscrapers and the bustling activity below.

Dr. Iyer's caption frames the video as a comparative study between india and china, suggesting that China's success is rooted in its meritocratic principles. The post implies that while india has grappled with reservation policies for nearly eight decades, china has leveraged meritocracy to drive its rapid development. The video's narrative invites viewers to "brace themselves" for the stark contrast, hinting at a critique of India's approach to social and economic policies.

China's meritocratic system, often associated with its civil service examinations and performance-based promotions, has been a cornerstone of its governance since ancient times. This system was revitalized in the modern era, particularly under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping, who emphasized economic reforms and merit-based advancements. The video's focus on shanghai, a city that epitomizes China's economic transformation, aligns with this historical narrative.

In contrast, India's reservation policies, introduced in 1947 to address historical inequalities and promote social justice, have been a subject of ongoing debate. While aimed at uplifting marginalized communities, critics argue that these policies have sometimes hindered merit-based opportunities, affecting sectors like education and employment. Dr. Iyer's post suggests that this difference in approach has contributed to the divergent paths of development between the two nations.



Find out more: