💥When Empathy Becomes an Explosion
When actress Rashmika Mandanna said, “I wish men also got periods so they’d understand our pain,”
She probably meant empathy — not enmity.
But in 2025’s outrage economy, empathy doesn’t trend.
Anger does.
And within hours, the internet tore her apart — not just trolls, but even “ordinary men” who felt unseen, unheard, and unfairly targeted.
What began as a conversation about understanding pain turned into a war of who suffers more.
Because in today’s india, compassion is a competition — and everyone thinks their struggle hurts harder.
🩸 1. Rashmika’s Comment: The Intention vs The Interpretation
Let’s start where it began.
Rashmika wasn’t wrong in principle — menstrual pain is real, brutal, and debilitating.
Every month, millions of women go through cramps, nausea, migraines, and fatigue, all while pretending nothing’s wrong.
Her statement — “I wish men could experience it too” — was probably her way of saying, “I wish they understood.”
But in the world of social media, intent doesn’t matter — only headlines do.
The nuance was gone.
What remained was the soundbite — and that soundbite lit a fuse.
💻 2. The Internet’s Counterpunch — “We Have Our Own Pain”
Almost instantly, comments flooded in:
“I wish women would understand what men go through.”
“We don’t bleed every month, but we bleed inside every day.”
“Try paying EMIs, supporting families, working 14 hours, and still being called privileged.”
The replies weren’t just trolling — they were resentment disguised as defense.
Because beneath the sarcasm lies a truth india doesn’t like to face: men are breaking too, but nobody lets them say it without ridicule.
So when rashmika said, “I wish men had periods,” they heard something else:
“Your pain doesn’t matter.”
⚔️ 3. Feminism vs Reality — When the Message Loses the Masses
Modern feminism in india often hits a wall — not because men hate women, but because the conversation forgets both sides suffer.
When stars like rashmika make gendered remarks from a pedestal of fame, it sounds less like empathy and more like entitlement.
Because for the working-class man standing 12 hours on a construction site, or the cab driver paying school fees with borrowed money, “period pain” isn’t the benchmark for understanding struggle.
Pain has no monopoly.
And yet, online discourse turns every gender discussion into a zero-sum blame game.
🧠 4. The Pain olympics — Who Hurts More, Who Wins?
Here’s the ugly truth: both sides are right — and both are wrong.
Yes, women face biological, emotional, and social challenges that men will never fully comprehend.
But men face societal, financial, and psychological pressures that women often underestimate.
So when either side says, “You’ll never understand my pain,” what they’re really saying is, “I want to be seen.”
But instead of empathy, they get echo chambers.
Instead of solidarity, they get scorecards.
The result? A never-ending “Pain Olympics”, where everyone’s bleeding — but no one’s healing.
💬 5. The social media Spiral — Outrage as Oxygen
In 2025, one sentence can end your reputation — not because it’s wrong, but because it’s quotable.
Rashmika’s comment was tailor-made for virality: gender, emotion, celebrity, controversy.
It didn’t matter what she meant.
It mattered how it could be weaponized — by feminists to praise her, and by men to punish her.
The result: another internet bonfire,
where empathy became fuel and logic became ash.
social media doesn’t care about understanding — it cares about division.
Because division drives engagement.
And engagement is profit.
🏠 6. “Look After Your Parents” — The Comment That Hit Back Hard
Amid the backlash, one netizen’s reply stood out:
“I wish every woman looked after her parents and family — then she’d understand pain too.”
It wasn’t elegant, but it was honest.
Because in middle-class india, gender debates die at the doorstep of duty.
Whether it’s a man breaking his back for bills or a woman sacrificing her career for family, both are fighting invisible wars.
But when a celebrity reduces that complexity to a single biological metaphor, it feels dismissive — not empowering.
That’s why the internet snapped.
Not because rashmika was wrong — but because she was tone-deaf to the reality outside her privilege.
⚖️ 7. Beyond rashmika — The Real Issue Isn’t Gender, It’s Empathy
We live in an era where people mistake volume for validity.
Where shouting “feminist” or “men’s rights” louder than the other side feels like justice.
But true feminism — the kind worth fighting for — doesn’t wish pain upon men.
It demands that no one’s pain be ignored.
rashmika wanted empathy.
The internet wanted revenge.
And somewhere between those two extremes, humanity got lost.
💔 8. The Bottom Line — Stop Competing in Misery
The truth is brutal:
Everyone is bleeding from somewhere — women monthly, men silently.
The point of empathy is not to compare wounds, but to close them together.
So yes, Rashmika’s comment was clumsy — but the hate she received was cruel.
And both prove one thing:
We’ve stopped listening to understand.
We only listen to attack.
⚡ EPILOGUE: Pain Doesn’t Need a Gender
Periods hurt.
So does pressure.
So does life.
If empathy requires another person to bleed before you believe them,
Then maybe the real illness isn’t biological — it’s moral.
The next time a woman says, “You’ll never understand my pain,”
and a man replies, “You don’t understand mine either,”
remember — both are right.
And both are tired of being unheard.
Because in the end,
Pain doesn’t need gender — it needs grace.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel