When rhetoric meets reality, truth doesn’t just slap — it obliterates. Vijay, who strutted onto the stage at the Tamizhaga Vetri Kazhagam’s special general council with his usual cinematic swagger, thought he’d drop another “mass” political dialogue.
But in his attempt to roast DMK lawyers, he accidentally revealed one brutal fact: he doesn’t even understand the basics of the case he’s mocking.
💣 1. The SIT Wasn’t DMK’s Pet — It Was the High Court’s Order
Let’s start where logic begins (and apparently where Vijay stopped listening).
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) was constituted by the high court itself.
Not by DMK. Not by any political arm-twisting. It was a judicial directive — period.
So when the supreme court asked on what basis the SIT was formed, that query was naturally directed at the Registrar of the High Court, not the DMK’s counsel.
The DMK lawyers had no reason to bark back — because the bone didn’t belong to them.
⚖️ 2. Silence Isn’t Weakness — It’s Legal Precision
Vijay tried to paint DMK lawyers as tongue-tied and defeated.
In truth, their silence was strategic and appropriate.
When the apex court specifically asks the high court to explain, any lawyer with half a law degree knows: you don’t jump in uninvited.
DMK’s legal team didn’t “go silent” — they simply respected judicial process. Something Vijay might learn before his next script rewrite.
🎭 3. The “Mass Hero” Mistook Legal Procedure for movie Drama
In films, silence means fear.
In courts, silence can mean discipline.
But for someone used to punch dialogues and background scores, that nuance is apparently too subtle.
The way Vijay twisted courtroom procedure into a political insult was either a sign of ignorance — or worse, deliberate misinformation.
🧨 4. When Populism Meets the Law, the Law Always Wins
Theatrics might win applause in a theatre.
But in the courtroom, facts are the only dialogue that matters.
Vijay’s attempt to spin a judicial development into a “DMK lawyer humiliation” is not just cheap politics — it’s a dangerous narrative that insults the judiciary itself.
The irony? The very silence he mocked is what kept the lawyers within the bounds of law, while he screamed outside them.
🧠 5. If You Don’t Know the Law, Don’t Lecture on It
Every time Vijay tries to sound politically “woke”, he ends up exposing another layer of shallowness.
From vaccine comments to constitutional gaffes, his speeches show one consistent pattern — half-truths packaged as heroism.
Maybe next time, before questioning lawyers, he should sit through one full hearing — without a teleprompter.
🩸 FINAL WORD:
So, when Vijay fans cheer “mass” moments from the stage, the rest of tamil Nadu is starting to ask:
If he can’t grasp a basic judicial sequence, what happens if he ever tries to run a government?
The truth is simple — this wasn’t the DMK’s embarrassment.
It was Vijay’s own legal ignorance, live on display.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel