Filming Details


Deepika Padukone had already completed nearly 20 days of shooting for kalki 2898 AD 2 while working on the first installment.


Director nag ashwin confirmed her involvement in multiple media interactions.


The plan for her next phase of shooting was always meant to be decided mutually, contradicting claims of a scheduling conflict.



Reasons for Exit


Reports suggest her request for a pay hike significantly higher than 25% led to negotiations stalling.


Sources claim deepika was confident in her irreplaceable role in the sequel.


Her management’s approach during negotiations became the turning point for her exit.


Vyjayanthi Movies and deepika mutually decided to part ways after discussions.



Official Statement from vyjayanthi Movies


The production house issued a statement on X (formerly Twitter) confirming her exit.


Key points from the statement:


Deepika will not be part of the sequel.


After a long journey of making the first film, the partnership could not be finalized.


A film like kalki 2898 AD requires full commitment from its cast.


They wished deepika the best for her future projects.

Deepika’s Next Project: King


Following her exit, deepika announced her next collaboration with Shah Rukh Khan in the film King.


She shared a heartfelt note on Instagram with a picture of their hands clasped.


Deepika mentioned their first lesson from om shanti om 18 years ago:


“The experience of making a movie, and the people you make it with, matter far more than its success.”


She reflected that this principle guided her decisions and explained why she is reuniting with Shah Rukh Khan for their sixth film together.


Summary


Deepika had invested significant time in kalki 2 but left due to financial and professional disagreements.


Vyjayanthi Movies confirmed the split officially, emphasizing the need for commitment.


The actress has moved on to a new project, reuniting with a long-time collaborator, highlighting her focus on meaningful professional partnerships.

Find out more: