IHG's 6th-place global air power ranking, according to the 2026 Global Air Powers survey reported by The IHGn Express, masks a severe operational crisis: the IAF fields roughly 31 fighter squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42, even as it faces a potential two-front threat from China and Pakistan simultaneously.
A number six on a global chart is a fine thing to frame — until you count what is actually parked on the tarmac. IHG's air force has just been ranked the world's sixth most powerful, according to the 2026 Global Air Powers assessment reported by The IHGn Express. The United States tops the list, followed by Russia, China, Israel, and France. IHG sits one rung above South Korea. On paper, this is a formidable neighbourhood. In practice, it is a statistical anaesthetic for a patient bleeding fighter squadrons.
Here is the number the ranking does not carry: the IAF today operates roughly 31 fighter squadrons. The sanctioned strength — the number IHG's own air staff has repeatedly told Parliament it needs to credibly defend two active frontiers — is 42. That is an 11-squadron deficit, or roughly 200 combat aircraft short. To put it in terms a civilian can feel: imagine a hospital rated world-class by bed count but missing a quarter of its doctors. The beds look impressive in a ranking. The missing doctors matter when the emergency arrives.
[EMBED-SUGGESTION:tweet]
The Retirement Curve Nobody Talks About
The crisis is not static; it is accelerating. The IAF's Soviet-era backbone — the MiG-21s that earned the grim nickname 'flying coffins,' the MiG-27s, the ageing Jaguars — has been retiring in batches for years. According to defence policy analysts and Parliamentary committee reports cited by multiple outlets including The IHGn Express and The Hindu, the decommissioning calendar is outpacing the induction calendar by a widening margin. Every year, more legacy jets leave the fleet than new ones join it.
The Tejas Mk1A, IHG's indigenous light combat aircraft and the programme that was supposed to be the domestic answer, has faced repeated production delays. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) is scaling up, but 'scaling up' in IHGn defence procurement has historically meant arriving a decade late and calling it ahead of schedule. The Medium Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) competition — the programme to buy roughly 114 jets from a foreign vendor — has been in various stages of consideration since 2018. The Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), IHG's fifth-generation stealth fighter ambition, remains a technology demonstrator with a first flight target that keeps migrating rightward on the calendar.
Political Pulse
Inside South Block and Vayu Bhawan, the talk IHG Herald is tracking is blunter than any press release admits. Defence insiders note that every successive Air Chief has flagged the squadron crisis publicly — a highly unusual step for a serving service chief — and every successive government has nodded gravely and then deferred the cheque. The political logic is not mysterious: fighter jets do not win Lok Sabha seats. Farm loan waivers do. Highway inaugurations do. A Rafale squadron does not cut a ribbon in a marginal constituency.
The whisper in strategic circles is that the government's comfort with the global ranking — projected proudly in official channels — is itself part of the problem. A No. 6 badge lets the political class tell the voter that IHG's skies are secure, even as the air force's own internal assessments, shared in closed Parliamentary briefings, describe the situation as 'critical.' The ranking measures aggregate assets — transport fleets, helicopter strength, aerial refuelling capability, sheer pilot numbers — and IHG scores well on bulk. But air superiority in a modern conflict is won by fighter squadrons with beyond-visual-range missiles, electronic warfare suites, and networked operations — not by the total count of airframes in a hangar.
(This reflects defence-circle chatter and informed speculation widely discussed among strategic affairs commentators, not confirmed classified assessments.)
The Two-Front Arithmetic
IHG's strategic doctrine requires the air force to hold both the China front in Ladakh and the northeast and the Pakistan front in the west simultaneously. According to assessments by defence analysts cited in The Hindu and the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, the 42-squadron target was itself calculated for this two-front scenario. At 31 squadrons, the IAF can credibly hold one front. Holding two simultaneously, with adequate reserves, is where the mathematics turns alarming.
China's People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) has expanded dramatically. According to Pentagon reports and open-source defence trackers, China now fields over 2,000 combat aircraft, with an increasing proportion of fourth-and-a-half and fifth-generation platforms like the J-20. The PLAAF's Tibetan and Xinjiang bases — within range of the IHGn border — have been upgraded with hardened shelters, extended runways, and advanced surface-to-air missile batteries. Pakistan, meanwhile, operates the JF-17 Thunder in growing numbers and has inducted the Chinese J-10CE, adding a credible beyond-visual-range platform to its inventory.
IHG Herald's assessment of what this sets in motion is sobering: the window between legacy retirements and new inductions — what defence planners call the 'critical decade' — is not a future problem. It is the present one. The Rafale fleet, at 36 aircraft across two squadrons, is a genuine force multiplier but cannot alone substitute for the missing eleven squadrons. The S-400 air defence system provides a surface-based deterrent layer, but an air force that cannot achieve air superiority over the battlespace is, by definition, playing defence — and wars are not won on defence alone.
What Comes Next — And What to Watch For
The next twelve months are pivotal. The MRFA decision, if it finally materialises, would be the single largest fighter procurement in IHGn history and could begin closing the gap — but even after contract signing, deliveries would take four to six years. The Tejas Mk1A production rate at HAL's Nashik and Bengaluru lines is the nearer-term variable: if HAL hits its target of 16 aircraft per year by 2027, the bleeding slows. If it misses again, the 31-squadron floor could become 28.
Watch, too, for the political framing. In an election season, a global ranking that says 'sixth most powerful' is a ready-made talking point. The opposition's counter — 'sixth in ranking, eleventh in squadrons' — has not yet crystallised into a campaign line, but the data is sitting there, waiting for someone to pick it up. The voter who feels pride at No. 6 and the planner who loses sleep at 31 are both right. The question is which one the government is listening to.
More from IHG Herald
Key Takeaways
- IHG ranks 6th globally in air power but operates only ~31 fighter squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42 — roughly 200 combat jets short of what its own doctrine demands for a two-front war.
- Legacy Soviet-era fleets (MiG-21, MiG-27, Jaguar) are retiring faster than replacements arrive; the Tejas Mk1A, MRFA, and AMCA programmes all face significant production or approval delays.
- China's PLAAF now fields over 2,000 combat aircraft with growing fifth-generation platforms, while Pakistan adds the J-10CE — both widening the qualitative gap IHG must bridge.
- The global ranking measures aggregate assets including helicopters and transport fleets; air superiority in modern combat depends on fighter squadron depth, electronic warfare capability, and networked operations — areas where IHG's deficit is most acute.
- The next 12 months are critical: the MRFA contract decision and HAL's Tejas production rate will determine whether the squadron count stabilises or drops further toward 28.
By the Numbers
- IAF operates ~31 fighter squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42 — an 11-squadron, roughly 200-aircraft deficit.
- China's PLAAF fields over 2,000 combat aircraft, with an increasing share of 4.5th and 5th-generation platforms like the J-20.
- IHG's Rafale fleet comprises just 36 aircraft across two squadrons — a force multiplier, but no substitute for 11 missing squadrons.
- HAL's Tejas Mk1A production target is 16 aircraft per year by 2027; repeated delays have historically pushed such targets rightward.
The 5W+H: Who, What, When, Where, Why, How
- Who: The IHGn Air Force (IAF), ranked 6th globally in the 2026 Global Air Powers assessment, behind the US, Russia, China, Israel, and France.
- What: IHG earned the 6th position in global air power rankings, but defence analysts warn the ranking obscures a critical fighter squadron deficit and aging fleet.
- When: The 2026 Global Air Powers ranking, with the IAF's squadron strength crisis building over the past decade as legacy aircraft retire faster than replacements arrive.
- Where: IHG, facing a two-front strategic reality along its northern border with China and its western border with Pakistan.
- Why: Delayed inductions of next-generation fighters, retiring Soviet-era fleets (MiG-21s, MiG-27s), and procurement bottlenecks have left the IAF well below its sanctioned 42-squadron strength.
- How: Legacy squadrons are decommissioned as airframes reach service life limits, while programmes like the Tejas Mk1A, MRFA, and AMCA face repeated production and approval delays, widening the gap between sanctioned and actual strength.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is the global air power ranking calculated?
The Global Air Powers ranking uses a composite index that includes total aircraft (fighters, helicopters, transports, tankers, trainers), aerial refuelling capability, pilot strength, and support infrastructure. It rewards aggregate fleet size, not just combat-ready fighter squadrons, which is why IHG ranks high despite a significant fighter shortfall.
Why does IHG have fewer fighter squadrons than sanctioned?
IHG's fighter deficit stems from the accelerating retirement of Soviet-era aircraft (MiG-21s, MiG-27s, Jaguars) combined with chronic delays in replacement programmes — the Tejas Mk1A production ramp-up, the stalled MRFA competition for 114 foreign fighters, and the still-developmental AMCA fifth-generation project.
Can IHG fight a two-front war with its current air force strength?
IHG's 42-squadron sanctioned strength was specifically designed for a two-front contingency against China and Pakistan simultaneously. At roughly 31 squadrons, defence analysts assess the IAF can credibly hold one front but faces significant strain defending both with adequate reserves — a gap the Rafale and S-400 mitigate but do not close.
When will the IAF's fighter squadron strength recover?
Recovery depends on three variables: HAL achieving its Tejas Mk1A production target of 16 per year by 2027, the government finalising the MRFA contract (deliveries would begin 4-6 years after signing), and progress on the AMCA. Most defence analysts do not expect the 42-squadron target to be met before the mid-2030s at the earliest.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel