Mohammed shami spoke in double meaning..!?

In the match against the new zealand team, mohammed shami was the main reason for India's victory. mohammed shami took 5 wickets in the world cup League match between india and New Zealand. That's why the indian team reduced the new zealand team to 273 runs. india would have set a target of more than 300 if mohammed shami had bowled well in the last overs and not taken wickets. But, india chased down the target of 274 runs. india reached the target exactly in the 48th over. Mohammed shami did not feature in India's first four matches of the world cup series. hardik pandya picked up an injury before the fifth match against New Zealand. He has shown his ability by taking 5 wickets. Why is such an experienced talent not given a chance? Many people were raising the question. At the end of the match, Mohammad shami was awarded the man of the match award after taking 5 wickets. When he was asked about not being given a place in the team, he said that when the team is playing well, it is not difficult not to have a chance. Everyone is a teammate. Support them when they are playing well. He has no problem with that if it's for the benefit of the team. What is the double meaning in this is that if a player plays well then he should be supported. He took 5 wickets in one match in Australia's ODI series before the world cup series. After that, in the next chance he got, he again took 5 wickets. There is indeed no other player in the indian team who plays better than him. If that is the case then other players should support him. He is saying that there is no problem in being kept outside for the benefit of the team. If that is the case, the right decision would be to leave out Shardul Thakur, who is not bowling well, and let mohammed shami play in all the matches for the sake of the team. Although shami did not say it in this sense, if we follow the logic of his speech, shami should be given a chance in the team. Did captain rohit sharma understand this hidden message, whether shami knew it or not?

Find out more: