The increase in the number of mosques in Germany—from an estimated 10 in 1975 to around 2,500–2,750 by 2025—reflects broader demographic, social, and political developments over the past five decades. Much of this growth corresponds to the rise in Germany’s Muslim population, which largely stems from post-war labor migration agreements, especially with turkey in the 1960s and 70s, and later from refugee and asylum movements from countries like Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan. As these communities settled and grew, the construction of mosques became a natural part of establishing religious, cultural, and communal life in a new homeland.
Framing this development as “what colonialism looks like” is a provocative and deeply contested interpretation. Historically, colonialism involved conquest, economic exploitation, and political domination by foreign powers. In contrast, the growth of mosques in germany has occurred through democratic processes, legal protections for religious freedom, and voluntary migration. Muslim communities in germany are citizens or legal residents who live, work, and contribute to the country’s economy and society. The establishment of places of worship is a constitutional right, and drawing comparisons to colonialism misrepresents the dynamics at play and risks fueling xenophobia.
However, this sentiment points to broader anxieties some segments of the population may feel about cultural change, integration, and national identity. The visibility of mosques is often used symbolically in debates about immigration, multiculturalism, and the future of european societies. These concerns should be addressed openly but with nuance and responsibility. A society’s strength lies not in resisting change through fear, but in managing diversity through shared values, mutual respect, and civic engagement. Reducing complex demographic shifts to an idea of “invasion” or “colonialism” oversimplifies reality and erodes the foundations of pluralistic democracy.
Framing this development as “what colonialism looks like” is a provocative and deeply contested interpretation. Historically, colonialism involved conquest, economic exploitation, and political domination by foreign powers. In contrast, the growth of mosques in germany has occurred through democratic processes, legal protections for religious freedom, and voluntary migration. Muslim communities in germany are citizens or legal residents who live, work, and contribute to the country’s economy and society. The establishment of places of worship is a constitutional right, and drawing comparisons to colonialism misrepresents the dynamics at play and risks fueling xenophobia.
However, this sentiment points to broader anxieties some segments of the population may feel about cultural change, integration, and national identity. The visibility of mosques is often used symbolically in debates about immigration, multiculturalism, and the future of european societies. These concerns should be addressed openly but with nuance and responsibility. A society’s strength lies not in resisting change through fear, but in managing diversity through shared values, mutual respect, and civic engagement. Reducing complex demographic shifts to an idea of “invasion” or “colonialism” oversimplifies reality and erodes the foundations of pluralistic democracy.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel