A viral video posted by Neetu Khandelwal (@T_Investor_) has sparked outrage and skepticism about the credibility of educational institutions' placement claims. The video targets IIMT Group of Colleges, Greater Noida, and its bold advertisement boasting a ₹1.8 crore annual package for a student named Puneet Gautam. However, the narrative takes a dramatic turn as the video reveals a stark contrast to the advertised success. Here’s a breakdown of the five eye-opening points from this controversy.
1. The Lavish Claim: ₹1.8 Crore Annual Package
• advertisement Highlight: IIMT proudly displays a billboard claiming that Puneet Gautam, a former student, secured a staggering ₹1.8 crore per annum package.
• Visual Impact: The billboard is strategically placed on a busy road, making it impossible to miss for commuters and potential students.
• Public Perception: Such a high figure is meant to attract aspiring students by showcasing the institution's ability to secure top-tier placements.
2. The Viral Video: A Different Reality
• Video Content: The video begins by capturing the same billboard, then transitions to a man in a red shirt, allegedly Puneet Gautam, standing on a roadside.
• Contrasting Scene: The man is not in a corporate office or a high-profile job setting but is instead seen near an ice cream cart and a motorcycle, far from the glamorous life promised by the advertisement.
• Sarcastic Tone: The narrator mocks the claim, stating, “Look here, IIMT says they gave a package of ₹1.8 crore. Do you know what this person is doing right now? He is working as an ice-cream seller.”
3. Public Outrage and social media Reaction
• Viral Spread: The video quickly gained traction on X, with users expressing disbelief and anger over the perceived deception.
• Accusations: social media users accused IIMT of misleading students with exaggerated or fabricated placement statistics, a common criticism of private educational institutions.
• Debate Sparked: The thread saw a mix of humor, outrage, and calls for accountability, with some users defending the institution while others demanded transparency.
4. IIMT's Response: Damage Control or Denial?
• Official Statement: IIMT responded by clarifying that the content was intentionally created by mischievous elements to malign the college’s image.
• Identity Dispute: The institution claimed that the man in the video was not Puneet Gautam, who is actually living in London, and urged for the video to be taken down.
• Question of Credibility: Despite the denial, the incident raised questions about the authenticity of placement claims and the marketing tactics used by educational institutions.
1. The Lavish Claim: ₹1.8 Crore Annual Package
• advertisement Highlight: IIMT proudly displays a billboard claiming that Puneet Gautam, a former student, secured a staggering ₹1.8 crore per annum package.
• Visual Impact: The billboard is strategically placed on a busy road, making it impossible to miss for commuters and potential students.
• Public Perception: Such a high figure is meant to attract aspiring students by showcasing the institution's ability to secure top-tier placements.
2. The Viral Video: A Different Reality
• Video Content: The video begins by capturing the same billboard, then transitions to a man in a red shirt, allegedly Puneet Gautam, standing on a roadside.
• Contrasting Scene: The man is not in a corporate office or a high-profile job setting but is instead seen near an ice cream cart and a motorcycle, far from the glamorous life promised by the advertisement.
• Sarcastic Tone: The narrator mocks the claim, stating, “Look here, IIMT says they gave a package of ₹1.8 crore. Do you know what this person is doing right now? He is working as an ice-cream seller.”
3. Public Outrage and social media Reaction
• Viral Spread: The video quickly gained traction on X, with users expressing disbelief and anger over the perceived deception.
• Accusations: social media users accused IIMT of misleading students with exaggerated or fabricated placement statistics, a common criticism of private educational institutions.
• Debate Sparked: The thread saw a mix of humor, outrage, and calls for accountability, with some users defending the institution while others demanded transparency.
4. IIMT's Response: Damage Control or Denial?
• Official Statement: IIMT responded by clarifying that the content was intentionally created by mischievous elements to malign the college’s image.
• Identity Dispute: The institution claimed that the man in the video was not Puneet Gautam, who is actually living in London, and urged for the video to be taken down.
• Question of Credibility: Despite the denial, the incident raised questions about the authenticity of placement claims and the marketing tactics used by educational institutions.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel