🐍 ANACONDA BITES BACK… AND MISSES? FIRST REVIEWS SINK SONY’S META REBOOT AS ROTTEN TOMATOES TURNS SAVAGE
Some reboots limp in quietly. Others arrive hissing, hyped, and ready to strike—only to collapse under their own weight. Sony’s Anaconda sadly belongs to the latter category. What was pitched as a clever, self-aware resurrection of a cult creature feature has instead slithered into theaters, dragging a brutal 35% Rotten Tomatoes score, leaving critics cold and expectations crushed.
This was supposed to be the fun one. A meta twist. A loving parody. A midlife-crisis movie about remaking a bad movie… that somehow becomes good. With Paul Rudd and Jack Black front and center, optimism ran high. But once the embargo lifted, the venom came out.
🔥 THE CONSENSUS: A JOKE THAT OVERSTAYS ITS WELCOME
Critics agree on one painful truth: the idea is smarter than the execution.
The hollywood Reporter calls the action “weightless and unimaginative,” likening the jungle chaos to a theme-park ride without thrills.
Awards Radar lands a dagger straight in the premise, branding it a bad creature-feature remake that only half-works as a comedy.
Next Best Picture pulls no punches, accusing the film of shallow amusement, inconsistent performances, and a crippling lack of spectacle.
IGN labels it a “disappointing effort,” noting that the movie can’t decide whether it wants to be horror, satire, or farce—and fails at all three.
In short, the snake never truly scares, the jokes rarely land, and the meta commentary feels smug rather than sharp.
😬 META, BUT MAKE IT MESSY
The biggest irony? A film about the chaos of filmmaking becomes undone by its own confusion. director Tom Gormican aims for self-aware brilliance but reportedly never cracks the tonal code. The laughs exist—but they’re scattered. The action exists—but it lacks weight. The anaconda exists—but rarely feels threatening.
Instead of escalating into madness, the movie circles the same joke until it suffocates.
😏 NOT EVERYONE HATED IT… BUT THAT’S THE PROBLEM
A handful of outlets swam against the tide:
Deadline boldly crowns it one of the funniest films of the year.
San Francisco Chronicle praises its flashes of terror and smart humor.
But even these defenses feel like exceptions, not proof of redemption. When a movie inspires this much disagreement, it usually means one thing: it never fully commits.
📉 THE MOST DAMNING COMPARISON OF ALL
Here’s the kicker that stings hardest:
The much-mocked 1997 Anaconda sits at 39% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Yes.
The cheesy, CGI-ridiculed, guilty-pleasure original is technically better reviewed.
For a reboot designed to be smarter, sharper, and self-aware, that comparison is lethal.
🎬 THE PLOT PROMISED MADNESS… THE RESULT DELIVERED MEH
Two lifelong friends. One midlife crisis. One insane dream to remake their favorite “cinematic classic.” They head into the amazon with cameras, confidence, and nostalgia—only to run into a real giant anaconda that turns their joke project into a fight for survival.
On paper? Gold.
On screen? According to critics, a missed opportunity wrapped in irony.
🧨 FINAL VERDICT: A REBOOT THAT KNEW THE JOKE—BUT FORGOT THE BITE
Sony’s Anaconda wanted to be clever. wanted to be ironic. wanted to laugh with the audience instead of at itself. But in trying to be everything—comedy, satire, creature horror—it ends up being nothing memorable.
Sometimes, the snake doesn’t need reinvention.
Sometimes, it just needs teeth.
🎥 Anaconda slithers into theaters december 25. Whether audiences embrace the chaos or echo the critics? That verdict is still coiling.
click and follow Indiaherald WhatsApp channel